Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

AnkleBreaker Unity MCPio.github.atilaahmettaner/tradingview-mcp

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Comparable alternatives

Google MCP Toolbox for DatabasesMCP100 SelectedMCP Unity Editor (Game Engine)MCP100 SelectedFli - Flight Search MCP Server and LibraryMCP100 SelectedStripe MCPMCP100 SelectedGoogle Search Console MCP Server for SEOsMCP100 SelectedelevenlabsMCP100 Selected

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence field	AnkleBreaker Unity MCPWatchlist candidate	io.github.atilaahmettaner/tradingview-mcpMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for	Broad AI-assisted Unity Editor and Unity Hub workflows across scenes, GameObjects, components, builds, profiling, terrain, animation, and related tools	Generating chart-based technical indicators and summaries for symbols supported by the project's TradingView integration
Not ideal for	Narrow read-only Unity questions or projects that do not need direct Editor control	Auditable investment decisions, guaranteed real-time quotes, or order execution
Avoid when	Agent-made project changes cannot be inspected, tested, and reverted before they affect a shared branch or build	The output would be treated as financial advice or used without independently checking data freshness and symbol coverage
Provenance
Provenance details	Community implementation github:anklebreaker-studio · Publisher source ↗	Community implementation io.github.atilaahmettaner · Publisher source ↗
Maintenance
Maintenance details	Repo: Jul 27, 2026 Package: Not documented	Repo: Aug 7, 2026 Package: Not documented
Popularity evidence
GitHub stars	369 GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z	3,960 GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z
External adoption evidence	github: repository stars: 369Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗	github: repository stars: 3,960Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage note	Local stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
Authentication	No API key, OAuth, token, or user-authentication mechanism is documented; the bridge defaults to 127.0.0.1.	No TradingView account or API key is required. MARKETAUX_API_TOKEN is optional; hosted-service account and authentication details are not fully documented.
Cost	The publisher states that the MCP server and plugin are free. AI-assistant, Unity, optional asset, hosting, and model costs are separate.	Self-hosting is MIT-licensed. The README lists hosted plans at $9 or $29 per month with a three-day trial, and a Marketaux free key limited to 100 requests per day.
Permissions	Controls Unity Hub and Editor projects, including scenes, GameObjects, components, assets, scripts, builds, tests, packages, menu and C# execution, profiling, memory snapshots, logs, and screenshots.	Accesses public market data for quotes, technical analysis, screeners, backtests, news, and sentiment. The publisher says it does not execute trades or manage money.
Data handling	Processes local Unity projects, assets, scripts, scenes, builds, profiler and memory data, logs, and screenshots through the local bridge. External telemetry and retention are not documented.	Market-data requests and results are processed by the self-hosted or hosted server. Optional news and sentiment calls use Marketaux when MARKETAUX_API_TOKEN is configured; provider retention is not documented.
Limitations
Tradeoffs	The unusually broad tool surface can accelerate game-development work, but broad Editor control increases setup complexity and the impact of an incorrect action.	Natural-language analysis is convenient, while upstream data availability and indicator interpretation can still be incomplete or wrong.
Risk context	Broad local Editor and project control includes code execution, file, asset, and package mutation, builds, and profiling. Keep the bridge on localhost, use a disposable project or version control, and review the repository's custom license restrictions.	Outputs are informational, not financial advice, and can be delayed, inaccurate, or incomplete. Do not treat signals or backtests as recommendations; verify data and third-party terms.
Evidence date
Editorial review	2026-08-11	2026-08-11
Candidate evidence	2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z	2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →