Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldio.github.atilaahmettaner/tradingview-mcpMCP100 SelectedGoogle Search Console MCP Server for SEOsMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Generating chart-based technical indicators and summaries for symbols supported by the project's TradingView integration
  • SEO analysis across Search Console properties, queries, pages, indexing status, and sitemaps
Not ideal for
  • Auditable investment decisions, guaranteed real-time quotes, or order execution
  • General web analytics or SEO work that does not use Google Search Console data
Avoid when
  • The output would be treated as financial advice or used without independently checking data freshness and symbol coverage
  • You cannot grant the configured OAuth user or service account access to the relevant Search Console property
Provenance
Provenance details

Community implementation

io.github.atilaahmettaner · Publisher source ↗

Community implementation

github:aminforou · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 7, 2026

Package: Not documented

Repo: Jul 29, 2026

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

3,960

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

1,355

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

External adoption evidence
  • github: repository stars: 3,960Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 1,355Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationNo TradingView account or API key is required. MARKETAUX_API_TOKEN is optional; hosted-service account and authentication details are not fully documented.Uses Google OAuth client-secrets JSON and browser login, or a Google service-account JSON whose email has access to the Search Console property.
CostSelf-hosting is MIT-licensed. The README lists hosted plans at $9 or $29 per month with a three-day trial, and a Marketaux free key limited to 100 requests per day.The MIT-licensed server lists no MCP fee. Google Cloud or Search Console quota and billing implications are not documented.
PermissionsAccesses public market data for quotes, technical analysis, screeners, backtests, news, and sentiment. The publisher says it does not execute trades or manage money.Lists Google Search Console properties and reads analytics, URL inspection, and sitemap data. Site and sitemap add/delete tools are disabled unless GSC_ALLOW_DESTRUCTIVE=true.
Data handlingMarket-data requests and results are processed by the self-hosted or hosted server. Optional news and sentiment calls use Marketaux when MARKETAUX_API_TOKEN is configured; provider retention is not documented.Search Console properties, queries, pages, crawl and indexing results, and sitemap data are returned to the connected client. OAuth tokens are saved for reuse; service-account JSON is read from a configured path. Further retention is not documented.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Natural-language analysis is convenient, while upstream data availability and indicator interpretation can still be incomplete or wrong.
  • It reduces manual reporting work, but the assistant can see sensitive search-performance data and optional destructive site or sitemap operations require an explicit flag.
Risk contextOutputs are informational, not financial advice, and can be delayed, inaccurate, or incomplete. Do not treat signals or backtests as recommendations; verify data and third-party terms.Can expose private Search Console data and, when explicitly enabled, modify sites or sitemaps. Protect credential files, leave destructive tools disabled unless required, and restrict remote SSE deployments.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-08-112026-08-11
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →