Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldBackblaze B2 MCP ServerShortlist candidatecodaMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Backblaze B2 users who want AI-assisted object-storage operations with a deliberately scoped B2 application key.
  • Collaborative document and structured-table workflows in Coda.
Not ideal for
  • Organizations that require a long operational track record before allowing AI access to production object storage.
  • Teams outside the publisher ecosystem or without least-privilege credentials
Avoid when
  • Do not use an all-access B2 application key when a bucket/prefix/capability-scoped key is sufficient.
  • The connected identity is broader than the task requires
  • Tool calls cannot be reviewed before consequential mutations
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

github:backblaze-labs · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

ecosystem:coda · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

45

GitHub stars · checked 2026-10-21

Not documented
Package downloads / 30 days

819

package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-10-21

No reliable download data
Client coverage
Client coverage detailsNot documented
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationBackblaze B2 application key/credentials as documented by the official server.The official hosted endpoint supports OAuth 2 and personal access tokens.
CostBackblaze B2 storage, download/API transaction and model/provider pricing applies.The MCP integration has no separately verified MCP100 price conclusion. Publisher subscriptions, API usage, compute, storage, and AI-client charges may apply.
PermissionsExactly bounded by the connected B2 application key's capabilities, buckets and prefixes; broad keys can enable high-impact object mutation/deletion.Coda document sharing, user permissions, admin controls, and OAuth or PAT scope determine access.
Data handlingObject names/content and storage metadata requested through tools can be shared with the AI client/provider.Authorized service data and tool results pass through the MCP server to the connected AI client. Review the publisher and client data policies before using sensitive files & knowledge information.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Promising signal, but it ranks below the current Recommended/Shortlist admission cohort on maturity, uniqueness, publisher trust, security clarity, or MCP-native evidence.
  • Documents and tables can contain broad internal knowledge, and write tools can alter shared operational records.
Risk contextObject-storage mutation/deletion authority must be tightly scoped, and the server has only a few days of production history.Documents and tables can contain broad internal knowledge, and write tools can alter shared operational records. Use a test environment where practical, least-privilege credentials, narrowly enabled tools, and explicit confirmation for mutations. MCP100 did not execute third-party server code during this documentation review.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-10-212026-07-30
Candidate evidence2026-10-21T00:00:00Z2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →