Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldBrowser UseWatchlist candidateCodebase MemoryMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Users who need agentic browser automation exposed through MCP and can isolate browser credentials/sessions.
  • Repository indexing, symbol search, call-path tracing, impact analysis, and architecture queries across many languages
Not ideal for
  • Users who need a broadly proven, low-risk, fully mature Selected-grade integration today.
  • Tiny repositories, one-off text searches, or semantic questions unsupported by the indexed parsers
Avoid when
  • Avoid high-impact or sensitive production use unless the documented authentication, permissions, rollback, and data handling match your environment.
  • The source tree cannot be indexed locally or persistent cache files are prohibited
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

com.browser-use · Publisher source ↗

Community implementation

io.github.DeusData · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Stale

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Aug 14, 2026

Popularity evidence
GitHub starsNot documented

38,935

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Package downloads / 30 daysNo reliable download data

28,015

package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

External adoption evidenceNot documented
  • npm: package downloads: 28,015Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage detailsNot documented
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationLocal MCP process authentication is not a hosted account boundary; browser/model-provider credentials depend on configuration.No authentication or API key is documented for local stdio. CBM_ALLOWED_ROOT is an optional filesystem containment control; no containment is imposed when it is unset.
CostOpen-source software; model providers, browser/cloud services and websites may incur costs.The MIT-licensed native software lists no service fee. Local storage and package-manager costs are separate.
PermissionsCan exercise browser/session authority available to browser-use, including authenticated web sessions when configured.Indexes repositories, queries code and graphs, performs architecture and impact analysis, manages ADRs and watchers, deletes projects, and writes agent configuration, instruction, Skill, and hook files.
Data handlingVisited page content and browser state may be sent to configured model/provider services; retention follows those services and local browser setup.The publisher says processing is local and code does not leave the machine. Indexes, embeddings, memories, SQLite data, and logs persist under the local CBM cache directory.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Authenticated-session and web-action blast radius needs stronger Selected-grade safety and production evidence.
  • Persistent indexing can reduce repeated reads, but consumes local storage and graph results can become stale until the repository is re-indexed.
  • Version 0.10.8 includes correctness and reliability fixes affecting graph/search results and Windows behavior.
Risk contextAuthenticated-session and web-action blast radius needs stronger Selected-grade safety and production evidence.Indexing can capture sensitive files, while persistent graph data and installer/configuration writes expand local exposure. Set CBM_ALLOWED_ROOT, protect the cache, and use explicit project paths.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-09-13T00:00:00Z2026-09-05
Candidate evidence2026-09-13T00:00:00Z2026-09-05T00:00:00.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →
Compare MCPs | MCP100 Index