Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldbrowserstackMCP100 SelectedChrome DevTools MCPMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Cross-browser and real-device test execution, debugging, and result analysis.
  • Inspecting pages, console and network activity, automating browser actions, and collecting performance evidence in Chrome
Not ideal for
  • Teams outside the publisher ecosystem or without least-privilege credentials
  • API-only testing or browsers outside the project's documented Chrome support
Avoid when
  • The connected identity is broader than the task requires
  • Tool calls cannot be reviewed before consequential mutations
  • The controlled browser contains personal accounts, secrets, or sessions that the MCP client must not inspect or modify
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

ecosystem:browserstack · Publisher source ↗

Community implementation

io.github.ChromeDevTools · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 13, 2026

Package: Not documented

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Aug 10, 2026

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

150

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

49,168

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

30-day package downloadsNo reliable download data

7,541,930

30-day package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

External adoption evidence
  • github: repository stars: 150Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 49,168Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationThe official package uses BrowserStack credentials documented by the publisher.No server authentication is documented for local stdio. Running-browser connections support optional WebSocket headers; an open remote-debugging port lets local applications control Chrome.
CostThe MCP integration has no separately verified MCP100 price conclusion. Publisher subscriptions, API usage, compute, storage, and AI-client charges may apply.The open-source npm package lists no MCP fee. Chrome, Node.js, client, model, and external-service costs are separate.
PermissionsBrowserStack account, project, product entitlements, and access credentials govern available tests and results.Inspects, debugs, automates, and modifies browser state through navigation, input, script evaluation, screenshots, uploads, extensions, memory, performance, and PWA tools.
Data handlingAuthorized service data and tool results pass through the MCP server to the connected AI client. Review the publisher and client data policies before using sensitive browser automation information.Browser content is exposed to the connected client. Performance tools send trace URLs to Google CrUX by default, and usage statistics with invocation success, latency, and environment data are enabled by default; broader retention is not documented.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Test execution consumes plan capacity and may interact with externally hosted applications.
  • Deep DevTools access improves debugging, but exposes browser content and state; usage statistics and CrUX URL lookups are enabled by default unless disabled.
Risk contextTest execution consumes plan capacity and may interact with externally hosted applications. Use a test environment where practical, least-privilege credentials, narrowly enabled tools, and explicit confirmation for mutations. MCP100 did not execute third-party server code during this documentation review.Can expose sensitive browser sessions and execute arbitrary browser actions or scripts. Use isolated profiles, URL allow/block patterns, restricted file paths, and do not expose remote-debugging ports.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-07-302026-08-11
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →
Compare MCPs | MCP100 Index