Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldCircleCI Hosted MCP ServerShortlist candidateAsana MCPMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • CI failure diagnosis and controlled CircleCI workflow operations.
  • Read and manage Asana workspaces, tasks, projects, portfolios, and reports.
  • Teams already using Asana that can test with non-sensitive data and least privilege.
Not ideal for
  • Production use before the documented maturity gaps are resolved
  • Users who need an MCP100-recommended recommendation today
  • Unattended production workflows before permissions and failure behavior are reviewed
Avoid when
  • The connected identity is broader than the task requires
  • Tool calls cannot be reviewed before consequential mutations
  • The connected data or account cannot be safely exposed to the selected AI client
  • You cannot verify least-privilege access and review write-capable tool calls
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

CircleCI · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

Asana · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Sep 14, 2026

Package: Sep 14, 2026

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationThe hosted server and CLI-integrated server use publisher-documented CircleCI authentication.Use Asana's documented MCP-token and connected-user authorization path. The token is specific to the MCP server, while available actions remain bounded by the connected user's existing Asana permissions; OAuth-scope and revocation details should not be inferred beyond the reviewed publisher documentation.
CostThe MCP integration has no separately verified MCP100 price conclusion. Publisher subscriptions, API usage, compute, storage, and AI-client charges may apply.No MCP100 cost conclusion is published yet. The publisher's account plan, API usage, infrastructure, or per-action charges may apply.
PermissionsCircleCI user, organization, project, and token permissions govern available pipeline actions.The MCP token is specific to Asana's MCP server, but it does not provide per-tool OAuth scopes. Available MCP tools operate within the connected user's existing Asana permissions; any workspace restriction belongs to the documented app or distribution configuration rather than being intrinsic to every issued MCP token.
Data handlingAuthorized service data and tool results pass through the MCP server to the connected AI client. Review the publisher and client data policies before using sensitive automation & workflows information.Publisher-accessible account or application data may be returned to the MCP client and its selected model. Retention and subprocess behavior require candidate-specific review.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Current replacement implementations are documented as Preview, while the former standalone server is deprecated.
  • First-party provenance and a clear task improve confidence, but do not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
  • Client transport compatibility does not prove that authentication, scopes, failure handling, and every tool behave safely.
Risk contextCurrent replacement implementations are documented as Preview, while the former standalone server is deprecated. Use a test environment where practical, least-privilege credentials, narrowly enabled tools, and explicit confirmation for mutations. MCP100 did not execute third-party server code during this documentation review.Use a test workspace or non-production account, least privilege, read-only controls where available, explicit approval for mutations, and credential revocation after evaluation.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-07-302026-07-24
Candidate evidence2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →