Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldCodeGraph MCPWatchlist candidateContext7 MCPMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Exploring callers, callees, imports, dependencies, and change impact
  • Large multilingual repositories where graph relationships add value beyond text search
  • Teams wanting local code indexing without an external API key
  • Current library and API documentation inside coding agents
  • Read-only technical lookup with a small two-tool surface
  • Users who want remote or local npx connection options
Not ideal for
  • Small repositories adequately served by native code search
  • Memory-constrained environments that cannot support the default embedding model
  • Repositories whose source-derived indexes may not be persisted locally
  • Private internal documentation not indexed by Context7
  • Guaranteed authoritative answers without checking the cited upstream docs
  • Offline-only development
Avoid when
  • Source code cannot be indexed into a local persistent database
  • The MCP process may start in an unintended working directory
  • Generated, private, or credential-bearing paths cannot be excluded
  • Your policy prohibits sending formulated documentation queries to a hosted service
  • You require complete or guaranteed-correct community-contributed documentation
  • You cannot keep an API key out of shared configuration
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

CodeGraph AI · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

Upstash · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 10, 2026

Package: Aug 10, 2026

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Aug 11, 2026

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

61

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

60,740

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

30-day package downloads

5,470

30-day package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

3,916,841

30-day package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

External adoption evidence
  • github: repository stars: 61Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 60,740Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Claude CodeStreamable HTTP
Claude DesktopStreamable HTTP
CodexStreamable HTTP
VS CodeStreamable HTTP
CursorStreamable HTTP
OpenCodeStreamable HTTP
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationNone for the local stdio community server.Remote MCP accepts CONTEXT7_API_KEY as an HTTP header. The local package accepts --api-key. The CLI can use OAuth to generate an API key; unauthenticated documentation commands may have lower limits.
CostThe repository is Apache-2.0 licensed and the community server has no documented service fee. Local compute and storage apply, and separately offered CodeGraph Pro capabilities may be paid.A free API key and free usage are documented, with higher-rate or team/enterprise offerings potentially requiring a paid plan. Applicable limits should be checked in the current Context7 dashboard.
PermissionsThe server reads and indexes the current working directory by default or explicit `--workspace` paths. Tools can query and reindex code, index Markdown, persist project memories, and generate architecture documentation. Exclusion flags and profiles narrow filesystem and tool reach.The MCP surface resolves library identifiers and queries documentation. It does not require repository or filesystem write access for the documented hosted mode.
Data handlingCode-derived graph data, embeddings, indexed documentation, and memories persist locally under the CodeGraph data directory. The default embedding model is downloaded on first run; built-in exclusions cover common build, credential, and secret-file paths but do not replace an explicit workspace review.Context7 states that formulated queries are sent to its API while full prompts, source code, and conversation history are not transmitted; its tool descriptions instruct clients to remove secrets, personal data, and proprietary code.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Semantic graphs provide relationship-aware context but indexing consumes local CPU, memory, and storage.
  • Graph-only and narrow tool profiles reduce resource and context cost but remove semantic or broader tool capabilities.
  • Community features are open source, while additional Pro analysis and security capabilities are separately offered.
  • An API key is recommended for higher limits, adding account and secret management.
  • Context7 says it sends formulated queries rather than full prompts or source code, but queries still leave the client.
  • Community-contributed projects can be incomplete or inaccurate and should be checked against primary documentation.
Risk contextThe main risks are indexing unintended source or sensitive files, persisting source-derived embeddings and memories, and exposing broad tools to the agent. Set an explicit workspace, add exclusions, start with a narrow profile or graph-only mode, and protect or remove local index data when no longer needed.Primary risks are query disclosure, stale or inaccurate indexed documentation, and accidental API-key exposure. Keep queries free of proprietary details and verify consequential advice against first-party library documentation.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-07-242026-07-24
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →