Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldCrowdStrike Falcon MCPWatchlist candidateoktaMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Connect compatible AI clients to CrowdStrike's documented MCP capabilities.
  • Identity administration and audit workflows with scope-filtered tools and human oversight.
Not ideal for
  • Users who need a fully reviewed MCP100 recommendation today
  • Teams outside the publisher ecosystem or without least-privilege credentials
Avoid when
  • Permissions, credentials, and connected data cannot be tested with least privilege
  • The connected identity is broader than the task requires
  • Tool calls cannot be reviewed before consequential mutations
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

CrowdStrike · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

ecosystem:okta · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 12, 2026

Package: Aug 10, 2026

Repo: Aug 10, 2026

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

234

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

53

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

30-day package downloads

38,192

PyPI Stats package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

No reliable download data
External adoption evidence
  • zPlatform: Weekly downloads: 6,777zPlatform: Weekly downloads · Weekly · checked 2026-07-20T08:05:31.779ZEvidence source ↗
  • npm: package downloads: 26,402Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-07-29T17:30:00.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 234Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • PyPI Stats: package downloads: 38,192Non-comparable contextual signal.PyPI Stats: package downloads · Provider last month · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 53Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationFollow only the publisher source; credential storage, scopes, and revocation remain under review.Okta documents Device Authorization Grant for interactive use and private-key JWT for headless operation.
CostPublisher plans, API usage, infrastructure, or per-action charges may apply; MCP100 has not published a cost conclusion.The MCP integration has no separately verified MCP100 price conclusion. Publisher subscriptions, API usage, compute, storage, and AI-client charges may apply.
PermissionsExact permissions and read/write boundaries have not completed MCP100 review.OAuth scopes dynamically filter tools, runtime guards enforce scopes again, and Okta roles determine effective authority.
Data handlingCandidate-specific retention, subprocess, telemetry, and model-data behavior remain review items.Authorized service data and tool results pass through the MCP server to the connected AI client. Review the publisher and client data policies before using sensitive security information.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Publisher attribution supports discovery, but does not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
  • Identity mutations can lock out users or change security posture; destructive actions require supported client confirmation.
Risk contextUse a test account, least privilege, read-only controls where available, and explicit approval for mutations.Identity mutations can lock out users or change security posture; destructive actions require supported client confirmation. Use a test environment where practical, least-privilege credentials, narrowly enabled tools, and explicit confirmation for mutations. MCP100 did not execute third-party server code during this documentation review.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-07-242026-07-30
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →