Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldDoiT MCP ServerShortlist candidateCodebase Memory MCPMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Analyze cloud spend, FinOps data and DoiT platform information from MCP clients
  • Analyze cloud spend, FinOps data and DoiT platform information from MCP clients.
  • Repository indexing, symbol search, call-path tracing, impact analysis, and architecture queries across many languages
Not ideal for
  • Cloud-cost and billing data can be commercially sensitive. Access follows DoiT API permissions; use scoped identities and avoid exposing personal API tokens in prompts or repositories.
  • Tiny repositories, one-off text searches, or semantic questions unsupported by the indexed parsers
Avoid when
  • Cloud-cost and billing data can be commercially sensitive. Access follows DoiT API permissions; use scoped identities and avoid exposing personal API tokens in prompts or repositories.
  • The source tree cannot be indexed locally or persistent cache files are prohibited
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

DoiT · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

DeusData · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Aug 14, 2026

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

13

GitHub stars · checked 2026-10-20

44,904

GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-25T18:35:00Z

Package downloads / 30 days

6,935

package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-10-20

28,000

package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z

External adoption evidenceNot documented
  • npm: package downloads: 28,015Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage detailsNot documented
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationOAuth for the hosted Streamable HTTP endpoint; headless remote clients can use a customer personal API token as Bearer auth; local stdio uses `DOIT_API_KEY`.local stdio; no remote auth needed
CostThe user's DoiT plan must include API access; no separate MCP-specific price is stated in the reviewed repository.none beyond local resources
PermissionsTools follow the same permissions as the DoiT API identity/token. The user's DoiT plan must include API access.reads indexed source/project data; installer writes supported agent/editor configs/hooks
Data handlingTools can retrieve commercially sensitive cloud-cost, invoice, anomaly, and account data. The local server emits payload-free response metrics that exclude tool arguments and response bodies.local processing; current docs state no source/index/query/env/telemetry upload
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Shortlist evidence is sufficient for identity, setup and task value; authenticated runtime tool-schema measurement and exhaustive security certification remain out of scope.
  • Persistent indexing can reduce repeated reads, but consumes local storage and graph results can become stale until the repository is re-indexed.
  • Version 0.10.8 includes correctness and reliability fixes affecting graph/search results and Windows behavior.
Risk contextThe server includes generated/handwritten DoiT API tools and can perform writes where the DoiT API permits them. Cloud-cost and billing data is commercially sensitive.latest 0.10.x supported; SLSA/Sigstore/checksums/VirusTotal/security policy
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-10-192026-09-23
Candidate evidence2026-10-202026-09-25T18:35:00Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →