Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldElevenLabs MCPShortlist candidateJADX-AI-MCP (Part of Zin MCP Suite)MCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Managing ElevenLabs voice and chat agents from an MCP client
  • Creating, updating, duplicating, testing, and inspecting agent configurations
  • Generating speech and other supported creative media with explicit user intent
  • Working with ElevenLabs knowledge bases, tests, deployments, and conversation diagnostics
  • Navigating JADX decompilation, searching APK code, and accelerating reverse-engineering or security-analysis hypotheses
Not ideal for
  • Local-only or offline workflows
  • Users who cannot authorize an external AI client to access an ElevenLabs workspace
  • Workflows that require a stable, credential-free, universally identical tool surface
  • Definitive vulnerability certification, dynamic analysis, or reviewing applications without authorization
Avoid when
  • The assistant must not be able to modify or delete ElevenLabs workspace resources
  • Creative generation spend cannot be supervised
  • Workspace or conversation data cannot be sent through a hosted third-party service
  • APK contents, decompiled code, or findings cannot be shared with the connected AI client
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

endpoint:https: · Publisher source ↗

Community implementation

github:zinja-coder · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 22, 2026

Package: Aug 22, 2026

Repo: Sep 23, 2026

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub starsNot documented

2,822

GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-24T04:14:47.694000Z

Client coverage
Client coverage detailsNot documented
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationOAuth sign-in to ElevenLabs; revocable workspace-scoped access; no MCP API key required.The documented default is stdio with the HTTP endpoints on 127.0.0.1. The publisher explicitly warns that binding the MCP server to 0.0.0.0 or another non-localhost address exposes plain HTTP with no authentication or TLS, allowing anyone on that network to invoke all tools.
CostConnecting the MCP does not require a local install or MCP API key. Creative generation and other metered ElevenLabs operations may consume account credits; estimate-first guidance is documented for costly generations.The publisher distributes the project under the Apache License 2.0 and lists no MCP server usage fee. JADX, local compute, the selected MCP client, and model-provider costs can still apply.
PermissionsOAuth-scoped workspace access. Official MCP guidance includes read operations plus create/update/duplicate/delete agent and related resource operations; destructive calls exist.The published tools can read decompiled code for classes and methods, smali, AndroidManifest.xml, string and resource files, cross-references, and debugger frames, threads, and variables from the project open in JADX. They can also rename classes, methods, fields, packages, and variables within the JADX analysis workspace.
Data handlingRemote hosted service. Tool requests and authorized ElevenLabs workspace/media data are processed through ElevenLabs rather than staying local.The publisher's architecture sends tool requests from the LLM client through the Python MCP server over HTTP to the JADX-GUI plugin, then returns source, resource, manifest, and debugger data to the connected client. The reviewed README does not document telemetry, retention, or model-training use, so those behaviors remain unknown.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • OAuth removes local API-key management and local server maintenance, but the MCP is now a remote hosted dependency.
  • The hosted server expands beyond the old local speech/audio toolset into agent management and creative workflows, so old tool counts and Context estimates are not portable.
  • Some tools can create, modify, or delete workspace resources, and creative generation can consume credits.
  • JADX integration speeds static exploration, but decompilation is imperfect and AI-generated security conclusions can contain false positives or miss runtime behavior.
Risk contextHosted OAuth reduces secret-handling burden, but the server can perform state-changing and potentially destructive workspace actions and can trigger credit-consuming media generation. Human confirmation should be retained for destructive or paid operations.This server exposes sensitive reverse-engineering material and mutation tools for the APK project open in JADX. Keep both connections on 127.0.0.1 and prefer stdio; if remote access is unavoidable, use a trusted isolated network plus firewall or SSH tunnel. Treat decompiled source, resources, manifests, and debugger values as potentially confidential, and review rename operations before saving or exporting analysis artifacts.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-09-04T12:00:00.000Z2026-08-11
Candidate evidence2026-09-14T12:00:00.000Z2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →