Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldElevenLabs local MCP (archived)RemovedJADX-AI-MCP (Part of Zin MCP Suite)MCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Historical reference for teams migrating from the deprecated local implementation.
  • Navigating JADX decompilation, searching APK code, and accelerating reverse-engineering or security-analysis hypotheses
Not ideal for
  • New installations; use the hosted OAuth successor instead.
  • Definitive vulnerability certification, dynamic analysis, or reviewing applications without authorization
Avoid when
  • A current workflow requires maintained local ElevenLabs MCP support.
  • APK contents, decompiled code, or findings cannot be shared with the connected AI client
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

ElevenLabs · Publisher source ↗

Community implementation

github:zinja-coder · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Repo: Aug 6, 2026

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub starsNot documented

2,664

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Client coverage
Client coverage detailsNot documented
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationHistorical local API-key authentication; the successor uses OAuth.The documented default is stdio with the HTTP endpoints on 127.0.0.1. The publisher explicitly warns that binding the MCP server to 0.0.0.0 or another non-localhost address exposes plain HTTP with no authentication or TLS, allowing anyone on that network to invoke all tools.
CostHistorical local usage was subject to ElevenLabs account pricing.The publisher distributes the project under the Apache License 2.0 and lists no MCP server usage fee. JADX, local compute, the selected MCP client, and model-provider costs can still apply.
PermissionsThe retired local server used an ElevenLabs API key; this historical record is not an active setup recommendation.The published tools can read decompiled code for classes and methods, smali, AndroidManifest.xml, string and resource files, cross-references, and debugger frames, threads, and variables from the project open in JADX. They can also rename classes, methods, fields, packages, and variables within the JADX analysis workspace.
Data handlingHistorical local operation sent requested content to ElevenLabs services; current hosted data handling is documented on the successor record.The publisher's architecture sends tool requests from the LLM client through the Python MCP server over HTTP to the JADX-GUI plugin, then returns source, resource, manifest, and debugger data to the connected client. The reviewed README does not document telemetry, retention, or model-training use, so those behaviors remain unknown.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • The historical local API-key and package model is distinct from the hosted OAuth successor.
  • JADX integration speeds static exploration, but decompilation is imperfect and AI-generated security conclusions can contain false positives or miss runtime behavior.
Risk contextDo not install the archived local server. Review the hosted successor's current OAuth, workspace, and credit-spend boundaries instead.This server exposes sensitive reverse-engineering material and mutation tools for the APK project open in JADX. Keep both connections on 127.0.0.1 and prefer stdio; if remote access is unavoidable, use a trusted isolated network plus firewall or SSH tunnel. Treat decompiled source, resources, manifests, and debugger values as potentially confidential, and review rename operations before saving or exporting analysis artifacts.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-09-04T12:00:00.000Z2026-08-11
Candidate evidence2026-09-04T12:00:00.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →