Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Figma MCP BridgeContentful MCP Server

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Comparable alternatives

Google Search Console MCP Server for SEOsMCP100 RecommendedPlaywright MCPMCP100 RecommendedHugging Face MCPMCP100 RecommendedFramelink MCP for FigmaMCP100 RecommendedAsana MCPMCP100 RecommendedsanityMCP100 Recommended

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence field	Figma MCP BridgeShortlist candidate	Contentful MCP ServerMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for	Inspecting and operating the publisher-documented Figma bridge during design-to-code or design-automation work	Connect compatible AI clients to Contentful's documented MCP capabilities.
Not ideal for	Replacing designer review or guaranteeing production-ready code and pixel accuracy from arbitrary Figma files	Users who need a fully reviewed MCP100 recommendation today
Avoid when	The connected Figma file contains confidential designs, comments, assets, or data that must not reach the MCP client	Permissions, credentials, and connected data cannot be tested with least privilege
Provenance
Provenance details	Community implementation github:gethopp · Publisher source ↗	First-party MCP Contentful · Publisher source ↗
Maintenance
Maintenance details	Repo: Aug 10, 2026 Package: Not documented	Repo: Aug 7, 2026 Package: Aug 7, 2026
Popularity evidence
GitHub stars	484 GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z	61 GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-25T18:35:00Z
Package downloads / 30 days	No reliable download data	21,613 package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z
External adoption evidence	Not documented	npm: package downloads: 19,287Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage note	Local stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
Authentication	MCP authentication or tokens are not documented. The current Figma user must have permission to edit the target file for writes.	Contentful Management API PAT
Cost	The MIT-licensed project documents npx installation and lists no MCP usage fee. Figma plan, client, and model costs are separate.	Contentful account/plan limits apply
Permissions	Reads connected Figma files, documents, selections, styles, variables, metadata, and screenshots. Opt-in tools can edit text and properties, create or delete nodes, reparent content, and save screenshots locally; writes require Figma edit permission.	Contentful roles + space/environment scope; PROTECTED_ENVIRONMENTS can block env-scoped writes/deletes
Data handling	Streams live Figma document data from the plugin to the AI client through the local bridge; screenshots can be returned or saved locally. Telemetry, retention, and model-training behavior are not documented.	Content/asset metadata to Contentful CMA under configured token/space/environment
Limitations
Tradeoffs	Live design context reduces screenshot guesswork, while the bridge and Figma-side setup add moving parts and expose document content to the agent.	Publisher attribution supports discovery, but does not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
Risk context	Read tools can expose private designs and write tools can modify or delete shared files. Keep the unauthenticated local WebSocket and HTTP bridge restricted and require confirmation for writes.	CVE-2026-53957 fixed from 1.7.19; current source 1.21.1
Evidence date
Editorial review	2026-08-11	2026-07-24
Candidate evidence	2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z	2026-09-25T18:35:00Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →