Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldFigma MCP BridgeWatchlist candidateFramelink MCP for FigmaMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Inspecting and operating the publisher-documented Figma bridge during design-to-code or design-automation work
  • Providing coding agents with Figma node structure, styles, variables, and design assets needed for implementation
Not ideal for
  • Replacing designer review or guaranteeing production-ready code and pixel accuracy from arbitrary Figma files
  • Replacing designer review or guaranteeing pixel-perfect production code from arbitrary files
Avoid when
  • The connected Figma file contains confidential designs, comments, assets, or data that must not reach the MCP client
  • The connected Figma account exposes confidential files that should not be sent to the AI client
Provenance
Provenance details

Community implementation

github:gethopp · Publisher source ↗

Community implementation

io.github.GLips · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 10, 2026

Package: Not documented

Repo: Aug 7, 2026

Package: Jun 18, 2026

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

484

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

15,658

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

30-day package downloadsNo reliable download data

350,316

30-day package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

External adoption evidence
  • github: repository stars: 484Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 15,658Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationMCP authentication or tokens are not documented. The current Figma user must have permission to edit the target file for writes.Uses a personal access token through FIGMA_API_KEY or X-Figma-Token, or an OAuth bearer token. HTTP also supports per-request token headers.
CostThe MIT-licensed project documents npx installation and lists no MCP usage fee. Figma plan, client, and model costs are separate.The MIT-licensed server lists no MCP fee. Figma plan and API limits, client, and model costs are separate.
PermissionsReads connected Figma files, documents, selections, styles, variables, metadata, and screenshots. Opt-in tools can edit text and properties, create or delete nodes, reparent content, and save screenshots locally; writes require Figma edit permission.Reads Figma file and node data through the Figma API and downloads PNG, SVG, or GIF assets into a configured local image directory; no Figma write capability is documented.
Data handlingStreams live Figma document data from the plugin to the AI client through the local bridge; screenshots can be returned or saved locally. Telemetry, retention, and model-training behavior are not documented.Figma metadata and API responses are returned to the MCP client; raw tools write figma-raw.json locally and image tools save assets locally. Telemetry sends server, platform, session, and event metadata by default; retention is not documented.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Live design context reduces screenshot guesswork, while the bridge and Figma-side setup add moving parts and expose document content to the agent.
  • Structured design context reduces screenshot guesswork, but output quality still depends on file organization and granting access to Figma data.
Risk contextRead tools can expose private designs and write tools can modify or delete shared files. Keep the unauthenticated local WebSocket and HTTP bridge restricted and require confirmation for writes.Private design data and assets can reach the MCP client or model and local raw logs; telemetry adds metadata transmission. Protect tokens, restrict the image directory, and review downloaded and raw files.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-08-112026-08-11
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →