Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

groqChrome DevTools MCP

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Comparable alternatives

Azure MCP ServerMCP100 RecommendedContext7 MCPMCP100 RecommendedGrafana Cloud MCPMCP100 RecommendedGoogle MCP Toolbox for DatabasesMCP100 RecommendedPlaywright MCPMCP100 RecommendedtableauMCP100 Recommended

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence field	groqShortlist candidate	Chrome DevTools MCPMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for	Low-latency model-inference and multimodal processing workflows.	Inspecting pages, console and network activity, automating browser actions, and collecting performance evidence in Chrome
Not ideal for	Production use before the documented maturity gaps are resolved	API-only testing or browsers outside the project's documented Chrome support
Avoid when	The connected identity is broader than the task requires Tool calls cannot be reviewed before consequential mutations	The controlled browser contains personal accounts, secrets, or sessions that the MCP client must not inspect or modify
Provenance
Provenance details	First-party MCP ecosystem:groq · Publisher source ↗	Community implementation io.github.ChromeDevTools · Publisher source ↗
Maintenance
Maintenance details	Repo: Aug 13, 2026 Package: Not documented	Repo: Sep 24, 2026 Package: Sep 21, 2026
Popularity evidence
GitHub stars	43 GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z	52,542 GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-24T04:14:16.273000Z
Package downloads / 30 days	No reliable download data	7,881,886 package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-09-24T04:17:39.032000Z
External adoption evidence	Not documented	npm: package downloads: 7,541,930Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage note	Local stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
Authentication	The official server uses a Groq API key.	No server authentication is documented for local stdio. Running-browser connections support optional WebSocket headers; an open remote-debugging port lets local applications control Chrome.
Cost	The MCP integration has no separately verified MCP100 price conclusion. Publisher subscriptions, API usage, compute, storage, and AI-client charges may apply.	The open-source npm package lists no MCP fee. Chrome, Node.js, client, model, and external-service costs are separate.
Permissions	Groq API-key permissions, model availability, and account quotas govern usage.	Inspects, debugs, automates, and modifies browser state through navigation, input, script evaluation, screenshots, uploads, extensions, memory, performance, and PWA tools.
Data handling	Authorized service data and tool results pass through the MCP server to the connected AI client. Review the publisher and client data policies before using sensitive ai & reasoning information.	Browser content is exposed to the connected client. Performance tools send trace URLs to Google CrUX by default, and usage statistics with invocation success, latency, and environment data are enabled by default; broader retention is not documented.
Limitations
Tradeoffs	The implementation has limited maintenance history and a narrower evidence base than established Recommended entries.	Deep DevTools access improves debugging, but exposes browser content and state; usage statistics and CrUX URL lookups are enabled by default unless disabled.
Risk context	The implementation has limited maintenance history and a narrower evidence base than established Recommended entries. Use a test environment where practical, least-privilege credentials, narrowly enabled tools, and explicit confirmation for mutations. MCP100 did not execute third-party server code during this documentation review.	Can expose sensitive browser sessions and execute arbitrary browser actions or scripts. Use isolated profiles, URL allow/block patterns, restricted file paths, and do not expose remote-debugging ports.
Evidence date
Editorial review	2026-07-30	2026-08-11
Candidate evidence	2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z	2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →