Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldio.github.blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-serverWatchlist candidateAWS Documentation MCPMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Searching arXiv and retrieving or organizing papers through an MCP research workflow
  • Searching and reading current AWS service and API documentation
  • Finding related AWS documentation and regional documentation variants
  • Cloud-development questions that do not require AWS account access
Not ideal for
  • Systematic literature reviews, paywalled coverage, citation-complete searches, or judging research quality from metadata alone
  • Inspecting or changing resources in an AWS account
  • Authoritative architecture approval without human review
Avoid when
  • A downstream answer would cite or summarize a paper without checking its identity, version, content, and publication status
  • Queries may contain credentials, customer data, or confidential architecture details
  • The environment cannot make outbound requests to public AWS documentation
Provenance
Provenance details

Community implementation

io.github.blazickjp · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

Amazon Web Services · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Jul 29, 2026

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

3,052

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

9,513

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

30-day package downloads

79,761

PyPI Stats package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

No reliable download data
Shared repository starsNot documented

9,598

Shared repository stars (not MCP-specific) · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

External adoption evidence
  • github: repository stars: 3,052Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • PyPI Stats: package downloads: 79,761Non-comparable contextual signal.PyPI Stats: package downloads · Provider last month · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 9,598Non-comparable contextual signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationNo authentication is documented for local stdio. HTTP defaults to 127.0.0.1; the publisher requires authentication and network controls if a reverse proxy exposes it.No AWS account authentication is documented for the local AWS Documentation MCP Server. The local stdio process requires Python and uv/uvx plus outbound network access.
CostThe Apache-2.0 project lists no MCP fee. External service quotas or provider charges are not documented.The AWS Labs server is open source and no separate MCP fee is documented. Network access, the selected AI client, and any AWS services subsequently chosen remain separately chargeable.
PermissionsSearches arXiv, retrieves abstracts and LaTeX, downloads and converts papers, reads local papers, queries citations, exports citations, and creates or updates local topic watches and indexes.The documented server exposes read-oriented AWS documentation search, page reading, recommendation, and related-content tools. It does not require AWS account credentials or grant AWS resource permissions.
Data handlingPapers and indexes stay local while searches, source retrieval, citation graphs, and downloads call external services. Paper text and LaTeX are untrusted external content; retention and model-training behavior are not documented.Search phrases, documentation URLs, and requested page sections are sent to public AWS documentation services; matching public documentation is returned to the MCP client. Do not include secrets or private workload details in queries.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Natural-language paper discovery is convenient, while arXiv coverage, metadata, versions, and model-generated summaries can be incomplete or wrong.
  • It avoids AWS account credentials but still sends documentation searches over the network.
  • Using @latest simplifies updates but is less reproducible than pinning a reviewed package version.
  • Documentation retrieval can be current without guaranteeing that a suggested design is appropriate for the user's workload.
Risk contextDownloaded papers can contain prompt-injection instructions, and exposed HTTP could reveal research tools. Keep HTTP private, use approval controls, and treat paper content as untrusted.This is a comparatively narrow read-only integration, but retrieved text is external content and may be incomplete, outdated, or unsuitable. Keep queries non-sensitive and validate consequential recommendations against current AWS service documentation and account-specific requirements. This documentary review does not claim MCP100 execution testing.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-08-112026-07-24
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →