Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Framelink MCP for FigmaContentful MCP Server

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Comparable alternatives

Google Search Console MCP Server for SEOsMCP100 RecommendedPlaywright MCPMCP100 RecommendedHugging Face MCPMCP100 RecommendedAsana MCPMCP100 RecommendedsanityMCP100 RecommendedNotion MCPMCP100 Recommended

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence field	Framelink MCP for FigmaMCP100 Recommended	Contentful MCP ServerMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for	Providing coding agents with Figma node structure, styles, variables, and design assets needed for implementation	Connect compatible AI clients to Contentful's documented MCP capabilities.
Not ideal for	Replacing designer review or guaranteeing pixel-perfect production code from arbitrary files	Users who need a fully reviewed MCP100 recommendation today
Avoid when	The connected Figma account exposes confidential files that should not be sent to the AI client	Permissions, credentials, and connected data cannot be tested with least privilege
Provenance
Provenance details	Community implementation io.github.GLips · Publisher source ↗	First-party MCP Contentful · Publisher source ↗
Maintenance
Maintenance details	Repo: Sep 18, 2026 Package: Sep 21, 2026	Repo: Aug 7, 2026 Package: Aug 7, 2026
Popularity evidence
GitHub stars	15,901 GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-24T04:14:16.257000Z	61 GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-25T18:35:00Z
Package downloads / 30 days	288,200 package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-09-24T04:17:38.982000Z	21,613 package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z
External adoption evidence	npm: package downloads: 350,316Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗	npm: package downloads: 19,287Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage note	Local stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
Authentication	Uses a personal access token through FIGMA_API_KEY or X-Figma-Token, or an OAuth bearer token. HTTP also supports per-request token headers.	Contentful Management API PAT
Cost	The MIT-licensed server lists no MCP fee. Figma plan and API limits, client, and model costs are separate.	Contentful account/plan limits apply
Permissions	Reads Figma file and node data through the Figma API and downloads PNG, SVG, or GIF assets into a configured local image directory; no Figma write capability is documented.	Contentful roles + space/environment scope; PROTECTED_ENVIRONMENTS can block env-scoped writes/deletes
Data handling	Figma metadata and API responses are returned to the MCP client; raw tools write figma-raw.json locally and image tools save assets locally. Telemetry sends server, platform, session, and event metadata by default; retention is not documented.	Content/asset metadata to Contentful CMA under configured token/space/environment
Limitations
Tradeoffs	Structured design context reduces screenshot guesswork, but output quality still depends on file organization and granting access to Figma data.	Publisher attribution supports discovery, but does not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
Risk context	Private design data and assets can reach the MCP client or model and local raw logs; telemetry adds metadata transmission. Protect tokens, restrict the image directory, and review downloaded and raw files.	CVE-2026-53957 fixed from 1.7.19; current source 1.21.1
Evidence date
Editorial review	2026-08-11	2026-07-24
Candidate evidence	2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z	2026-09-25T18:35:00Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →