Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldKubernetes MCPShortlist candidateTerraform MCPMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Connect compatible AI clients to Containers community's documented MCP capabilities.
  • Connect compatible AI clients to HashiCorp's documented MCP capabilities.
Not ideal for
  • Users who need a fully reviewed MCP100 recommendation today
  • Users who need a fully reviewed MCP100 recommendation today
Avoid when
  • Permissions, credentials, and connected data cannot be tested with least privilege
  • Permissions, credentials, and connected data cannot be tested with least privilege
Provenance
Provenance details

Community implementation

Containers community · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

HashiCorp · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Jul 31, 2026

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

1,958

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

1,534

GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-25T18:35:00Z

External adoption evidence
  • npm: package downloads: 60,462Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Not documented
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationFollow only the publisher source; credential storage, scopes, and revocation remain under review.HCP Terraform/TFE API tokens; remote client may pass per-user TFE_TOKEN
CostPublisher plans, API usage, infrastructure, or per-action charges may apply; MCP100 has not published a cost conclusion.HCP/TFE/run costs may apply
PermissionsExact permissions and read/write boundaries have not completed MCP100 review.HCP Terraform/TFE RBAC
Data handlingCandidate-specific retention, subprocess, telemetry, and model-data behavior remain review items.registry/HCP/TFE data may reach connected MCP client/LLM
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Publisher attribution supports discovery, but does not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
  • Publisher attribution supports discovery, but does not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
Risk contextUse a test account, least privilege, read-only controls where available, and explicit approval for mutations.stdio/localhost defaults; strict CORS; TLS verify on; rate limits; ENABLE_TF_OPERATIONS=false by default
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-07-242026-07-24
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-09-25T18:35:00Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →