Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Lucid MCPGoogle Search Console MCP Server for SEOs

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Comparable alternatives

Playwright MCPMCP100 RecommendedHugging Face MCPMCP100 RecommendedFramelink MCP for FigmaMCP100 RecommendedAsana MCPMCP100 RecommendedsanityMCP100 RecommendedFli - Flight Search MCP Server and LibraryMCP100 Recommended

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence field	Lucid MCPShortlist candidate	Google Search Console MCP Server for SEOsMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for	Search, read, create, and edit Lucid visual documents Lucid users who need to search, read, create, and edit lucid visual documents.	SEO analysis across Search Console properties, queries, pages, indexing status, and sitemaps
Not ideal for	The default endpoint permits supported writes; use https://mcp.lucid.app/mcp/readonly for discovery-only access. Lucid MCP is not available for FedRAMP accounts, and a separate repositories endpoint serves different workflows.	General web analytics or SEO work that does not use Google Search Console data
Avoid when	The default endpoint permits supported writes; use https://mcp.lucid.app/mcp/readonly for discovery-only access. Lucid MCP is not available for FedRAMP accounts, and a separate repositories endpoint serves different workflows.	You cannot grant the configured OAuth user or service account access to the relevant Search Console property
Provenance
Provenance details	First-party MCP Lucid · Publisher source ↗	Community implementation github:aminforou · Publisher source ↗
Maintenance
Maintenance details	Repo: Not documented Package: Not documented	Repo: Sep 15, 2026 Package: Not documented
Popularity evidence
GitHub stars	Not documented	1,712 GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-24T04:14:16.248000Z
Shared repository stars	3 Shared repository stars (not MCP-specific) · checked 2026-10-20	Not documented
Client coverage
Client coverage details	Not documented	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage note	Local stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
Authentication	OAuth by default; Lucid Team and Enterprise users can also authenticate with an API key.	Uses Google OAuth client-secrets JSON and browser login, or a Google service-account JSON whose email has access to the Search Console property.
Cost	No separate MCP fee is documented. Lucid offers free and paid plans; account/product capabilities depend on the selected plan.	The MIT-licensed server lists no MCP fee. Google Cloud or Search Console quota and billing implications are not documented.
Permissions	The MCP can access only documents the authenticated user already has permission to access within the Lucid account; it cannot access documents owned by users outside that account.	Lists Google Search Console properties and reads analytics, URL inspection, and sitemap data. Site and sitemap add/delete tools are disabled unless GSC_ALLOW_DESTRUCTIVE=true.
Data handling	Lucid states that its MCP server acts as a pass-through and does not retain document content, user prompts, or queries. User credentials are not shared outside the Lucid account.	Search Console properties, queries, pages, crawl and indexing results, and sitemap data are returned to the connected client. OAuth tokens are saved for reuse; service-account JSON is read from a configured path. Further retention is not documented.
Limitations
Tradeoffs	Shortlist evidence is sufficient for identity, setup and task value; authenticated runtime tool-schema measurement and exhaustive security certification remain out of scope.	It reduces manual reporting work, but the assistant can see sensitive search-performance data and optional destructive site or sitemap operations require an explicit flag.
Risk context	The MCP can expose and operate on diagrams/documents the user can access. The main risk is unintended disclosure or modification of collaborative Lucid content within the user's existing permissions.	Can expose private Search Console data and, when explicitly enabled, modify sites or sitemaps. Protect credential files, leave destructive tools disabled unless required, and restrict remote SSE deployments.
Evidence date
Editorial review	2026-10-19	2026-08-11
Candidate evidence	2026-10-20	2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →