Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldMake MCPShortlist candidateCodebase Memory MCPMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Run and manage Make automation workflows from MCP clients
  • Run and manage Make automation workflows from MCP clients.
  • Repository indexing, symbol search, call-path tracing, impact analysis, and architecture queries across many languages
Not ideal for
  • Management scopes can modify scenarios, connections, webhooks, data stores and organization resources; scenario runs can trigger downstream external actions. OAuth can restrict access to a specific Make organization, while MCP-token access is broader by token scope.
  • Tiny repositories, one-off text searches, or semantic questions unsupported by the indexed parsers
Avoid when
  • Management scopes can modify scenarios, connections, webhooks, data stores and organization resources; scenario runs can trigger downstream external actions. OAuth can restrict access to a specific Make organization, while MCP-token access is broader by token scope.
  • The source tree cannot be indexed locally or persistent cache files are prohibited
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

Make · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

DeusData · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Aug 14, 2026

Popularity evidence
GitHub starsNot documented

44,904

GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-25T18:35:00Z

Package downloads / 30 daysNo reliable download data

28,000

package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z

External adoption evidenceNot documented
  • npm: package downloads: 28,015Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage detailsNot documented
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationOAuth to `https://mcp.make.com`, or an MCP token using the Make-hosted regional connection URL.local stdio; no remote auth needed
CostNo separate MCP-server price was stated in the reviewed MCP overview. Scenario-run tools are available across plans; management-tool availability is plan-dependent.none beyond local resources
PermissionsAvailable tools are controlled by granted OAuth/MCP-token scopes and the selected Make organization. Scenario-run tools are broadly available; management tools depend on plan and granted management scopes.reads indexed source/project data; installer writes supported agent/editor configs/hooks
Data handlingTool inputs are sent to Make to invoke or manage Make resources/scenarios, and Make returns tool outputs to the MCP client. The reviewed MCP docs do not state a separate MCP-specific model-training policy.local processing; current docs state no source/index/query/env/telemetry upload
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Shortlist evidence is sufficient for identity, setup and task value; authenticated runtime tool-schema measurement and exhaustive security certification remain out of scope.
  • Persistent indexing can reduce repeated reads, but consumes local storage and graph results can become stale until the repository is re-indexed.
  • Version 0.10.8 includes correctness and reliability fixes affecting graph/search results and Windows behavior.
Risk contextRunning a scenario can trigger downstream external actions. Management scopes can modify Make scenarios, connections, webhooks, data stores, and organization resources.latest 0.10.x supported; SLSA/Sigstore/checksums/VirusTotal/security policy
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-10-192026-09-23
Candidate evidence2026-10-202026-09-25T18:35:00Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →