Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldKiCAD MCP ServerMCP100 SelectedGhidra MCP ServerMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Assisting with KiCad project inspection and repetitive PCB or schematic editing tasks
  • Querying decompilation, symbols, references, functions, and analysis state inside Ghidra
Not ideal for
  • Safety-critical electrical design or final design-rule approval without an experienced engineer
  • Static analysis workflows that do not use Ghidra or do not need agent-driven interaction
Avoid when
  • You cannot version, inspect, and independently validate every generated design change
  • The analyzed binary or Ghidra project cannot be exposed to the connected AI client
Provenance
Provenance details

Community implementation

github:mixelpixx · Publisher source ↗

Community implementation

github:bethington · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Not documented

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

1,876

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

3,308

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

External adoption evidence
  • github: repository stars: 1,876Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 3,308Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationNo authentication is documented for the local MCP server. JLCPCB live lookup optionally uses JLCPCB_APP_ID, JLCPCB_API_KEY, and JLCPCB_API_SECRET; local catalog search needs no credentials.HTTP bearer authentication is optional through GHIDRA_MCP_AUTH_TOKEN; without it authentication is disabled. Non-loopback binding is refused without a token. Scripts require GHIDRA_MCP_ALLOW_SCRIPTS.
CostThe MIT-licensed server lists no MCP fee. The JLCPCB guide says Basic parts have free assembly and Extended parts charge a $3 setup fee per unique part; manufacturing charges are separate.The Apache-2.0 project lists no MCP fee. Ghidra, Java, Maven, hosting, and shared-server costs are separate.
PermissionsReads and writes KiCad boards, schematics, projects, libraries, and assets, with auto-save, UI control, autorouting, exports, and optional JLCPCB catalog and API operations.Reads and writes binaries and projects, renames and types symbols, adds comments and structures, executes scripts, performs P-code emulation and debugging, and integrates with Ghidra Server.
Data handlingLocal operations read and write design files and paths. Developer logs contain tool-call history, paths, and design details. Optional JLCPCB lookups send configured credentials and requests to JLCPCB; retention is not documented.Operates on local binaries and projects and optionally shared Ghidra Server data; decompilation, memory, debugger, and script results are returned through MCP. Telemetry and retention are not documented.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Automation can accelerate layout work, but malformed or electrically incorrect edits may look plausible and can become expensive after fabrication.
  • It accelerates navigation and analysis, but agent actions can alter project state and reverse-engineering output still requires expert validation.
Risk contextAuto-save, deletion, board and schematic writes, routing, and external integrations can damage designs or expose files and credentials. Use backups and version control, review writes, and protect environment files and logs.Write access, optional arbitrary Java scripts, debugger control, and shared-server access create substantial integrity and confidentiality risk. Prefer loopback, bearer auth, scopes, scripts disabled, and supervised writes.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-08-112026-08-11
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →