Field-by-field comparison
Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.
Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.
| Evidence field | MongoDB MCPMCP100 Selected | Redis MCPMCP100 Selected |
|---|---|---|
| Task fit | ||
| Best for |
|
|
| Not ideal for |
|
|
| Avoid when |
|
|
| Provenance | ||
| Provenance details | First-party MCP MongoDB · Publisher source ↗ | First-party MCP Redis · Publisher source ↗ |
| Maintenance | ||
| Maintenance details | Repo: Aug 14, 2026 Package: Aug 10, 2026 | Repo: Aug 5, 2026 Package: Aug 5, 2026 |
| Popularity evidence | ||
| GitHub stars | 1,098 GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z | 568 GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z |
| 30-day package downloads | 445,811 30-day package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z | 22,058 PyPI Stats package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z |
| External adoption evidence |
|
|
| Client coverage | ||
| Client coverage details | Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio | Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio |
| Client coverage note | Local stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server. | |
| Access and data | ||
| Authentication | Supports MongoDB connection strings and MongoDB authentication mechanisms, including enterprise OIDC, LDAP, Kerberos, and X.509 where supported. Atlas management tools use an appropriately permissioned Atlas service account. | Supports Redis username/password URLs, individual credential options, TLS through `rediss://`, CA certificate verification, cluster mode, and Microsoft Entra ID authentication for Azure Managed Redis. |
| Cost | The official MCP server is open source and has no separately documented server fee. MongoDB Atlas, Enterprise Advanced, infrastructure, data transfer, and AI-client charges remain applicable. | The first-party server is open source and the PyPI package documents no MCP usage fee. Redis Cloud, infrastructure, network, container, and AI-client costs remain separate. |
| Permissions | Database operations run with the connected MongoDB user's roles; Atlas operations require an Atlas service account with the relevant project permissions. The server exposes database, collection, query, index, performance, and Atlas administration tools. Publisher examples recommend `--readOnly` for data access. | The server can read and write Redis keys and data structures, operate streams and pub/sub, manage search indexes, and inspect server information according to the connected Redis user's ACL. Redis ACL configuration is the effective permission boundary. |
| Data handling | The local MCP process connects to the configured MongoDB deployment and returns query, schema, index, and Atlas results to the AI client. Export features can write query or aggregation results to local files. Telemetry collection can be configured or disabled; logs may contain operational metadata and must be handled appropriately. | The stdio server runs locally and sends Redis query inputs and returned key values to the connected MCP client. It connects directly to the configured Redis deployment. Credentials can be supplied in a URI, CLI arguments, or environment variables; avoid embedding them in shareable config and logs. |
| Limitations | ||
| Tradeoffs |
|
|
| Risk context | The main risks are disclosure or mutation of database records and over-broad Atlas administration. Start with `--readOnly`, a dedicated least-privilege database user, narrowly scoped Atlas service credentials, disabled unnecessary tools and telemetry, and non-production data. This review does not claim MCP100 execution testing. | A broad Redis tool set can expose or mutate application state, sessions, queues, cached records, and vector data. Use a dedicated database, a narrowly scoped ACL user, verified TLS, pinned releases, and backups. This review does not claim MCP100 execution testing. |
| Evidence date | ||
| Editorial review | 2026-07-24 | 2026-07-24 |
| Candidate evidence | 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z | 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z |
Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.
Read the evidence method →