Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldFreeCAD MCPShortlist candidateio.github.atilaahmettaner/tradingview-mcpMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Creating, inspecting, and modifying FreeCAD documents through an AI-assisted desktop workflow
  • Generating chart-based technical indicators and summaries for symbols supported by the project's TradingView integration
Not ideal for
  • Final engineering sign-off, safety-critical CAD, or manufacturing output without expert verification
  • Auditable investment decisions, guaranteed real-time quotes, or order execution
Avoid when
  • Generated model changes cannot be reviewed, regenerated, and reverted before downstream use
  • The output would be treated as financial advice or used without independently checking data freshness and symbol coverage
Provenance
Provenance details

Community implementation

neka-nat · Publisher source ↗

Community implementation

io.github.atilaahmettaner · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 7, 2026

Package: Not documented

Repo: Sep 1, 2026

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

2,457

GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z

4,624

GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-24T04:14:39.529000Z

Package downloads / 30 days

35,300

package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-09-08

No reliable download data
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationIP allowlisting is documented for RPC access. User credentials, tokens, OAuth, and other authentication are not documented.No TradingView account or API key is required. MARKETAUX_API_TOKEN is optional; hosted-service account and authentication details are not fully documented.
CostNo MCP project or service price is documented. FreeCAD and related dependency costs are separate.Self-hosting is MIT-licensed. The README lists hosted plans at $9 or $29 per month with a three-day trial, and a Marketaux free key limited to 100 requests per day.
PermissionsControls FreeCAD documents and objects, including create, edit, and delete operations. It can execute arbitrary Python, take screenshots, inspect objects, insert parts, and run FEM analysis.Accesses public market data for quotes, technical analysis, screeners, backtests, news, and sentiment. The publisher says it does not execute trades or manage money.
Data handlingProcesses local FreeCAD documents, objects, screenshots, and analysis files. RPC is localhost by default and can be configured for remote IP or CIDR access. External telemetry and retention are not documented.Market-data requests and results are processed by the self-hosted or hosted server. Optional news and sentiment calls use Marketaux when MARKETAUX_API_TOKEN is configured; provider retention is not documented.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Agent control can speed repetitive modeling, but CAD operations are stateful and seemingly valid geometry may still violate design intent or constraints.
  • Natural-language analysis is convenient, while upstream data availability and indicator interpretation can still be incomplete or wrong.
Risk contextArbitrary Python and destructive document operations provide very high local control. Keep RPC on localhost; if remote access is necessary, use a restrictive allowlist and additional authentication because IP filtering is not user authentication.Outputs are informational, not financial advice, and can be delayed, inaccurate, or incomplete. Do not treat signals or backtests as recommendations; verify data and third-party terms. Version 0.9.0 fixes reported wrong exchange fallback, top_losers returning gainers, fabricated volume breakouts, and other analysis/backtest issues.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-09-232026-09-05
Candidate evidence2026-09-24T00:00:00.000Z2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →