Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldPerplexity MCPMCP100 RecommendedFirecrawl MCPMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Current web search and cited question answering with Perplexity APIs
  • Research workflows that need a focused search/reasoning MCP rather than browser automation
  • Scraping and extracting public web pages
  • Search, crawl, map, batch, and research workflows
  • Teams already using Firecrawl API limits and governance
Not ideal for
  • Offline or private-network-only workflows
  • Users who want browser control, arbitrary website mutation, or a free unlimited search service
  • Simple known-page fetches that do not justify a paid API
  • Sites whose terms or access controls prohibit automated collection
  • Workflows requiring guaranteed freshness or extraction accuracy
Avoid when
  • You cannot safely store a Perplexity API key
  • You plan to expose the local HTTP transport publicly without adding inbound authentication and explicit host/origin allowlists
  • You cannot govern which URLs the agent may access
  • The workflow may collect personal, confidential, copyrighted, or access-controlled content without review
  • Unexpected API-credit consumption is unacceptable
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

Perplexity · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

Firecrawl · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 27, 2026

Package: Sep 21, 2026

Repo: Sep 24, 2026

Package: Sep 21, 2026

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

2,539

GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-24T04:14:26.310000Z

7,507

GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-24T04:14:47.690000Z

Package downloads / 30 days

135,602

package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-09-24T04:17:38.844000Z

126,701

package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-09-24T04:17:59.638000Z

External adoption evidenceNot documented
  • npm: package downloads: 412,488Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationHosted MCP and local stdio use a Perplexity API key. The hosted Streamable HTTP endpoint accepts Authorization: Bearer <API key>. The local HTTP transport uses PERPLEXITY_API_KEY for outbound Perplexity API calls but does not authenticate inbound MCP callers.Cloud and local-package configurations use FIRECRAWL_API_KEY. Official docs also show hosted MCP URLs containing the key; environment-variable or protected input handling is safer than embedding the key in a URL.
CostPerplexity API access is pay-as-you-go using separately purchased API credits; a Perplexity Pro subscription is not required. Search/research calls can incur API usage charges.MCP calls consume the account's standard Firecrawl API credits and rate limits. Search, crawl, batch, and agent operations can consume more resources than single-page scraping; current plan pricing applies.
PermissionsThe MCP is limited to four Perplexity search/reasoning/research tools. Effective quota and billing exposure are those of the supplied API key; it does not expose unrelated Perplexity account-management actions.The MCP can initiate outbound requests to user- or model-selected URLs and invoke Firecrawl scrape, search, crawl, map, extraction, batch, and research capabilities according to enabled tools and account limits.
Data handlingQueries are sent to Perplexity's Search API and Agent API and results are returned to the MCP client. Search/research output contains third-party web content and should be treated as untrusted external data.URLs, queries, extraction schemas, and retrieved page content are processed by the configured Firecrawl service. Cloud mode sends them to Firecrawl; self-hosted mode follows the operator's deployment and any configured model/provider dependencies.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • The four-tool surface is focused and easier to reason about than broad browser MCPs, but requests and usage are billed through the Perplexity API Platform
  • The hosted remote server is easiest to operate; self-hosted HTTP requires the operator to secure inbound access because the server intentionally does not authenticate inbound callers
  • Broad scrape, crawl, search, and autonomous-agent tools are powerful but enlarge prompt-injection, compliance, and cost exposure.
  • Cloud mode is easy to configure; self-hosting adds operational burden.
  • Remote URL forms that embed an API key are convenient but can leak through configuration, logs, screenshots, or history.
  • The reviewed v2.0.0 release moved the MCP server to the Firecrawl v2 API and added Streamable HTTP.
Risk contextMedium. Protect the API key and monitor quota/cost. Web results can contain prompt injection. For self-hosted HTTP, default loopback/deny-all origin/host protections are important because inbound callers are otherwise unauthenticated.Main risks are prompt injection from untrusted pages, collection-policy violations, sensitive URL/query disclosure, API-key leakage, and agent-driven credit spend. Use URL allow-lists, low limits, human approval, and a dedicated low-budget key.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-09-112026-09-05
Candidate evidence2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →