Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldPerplexity MCPWatchlist candidatemeilisearchMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Connect compatible AI clients to Perplexity's documented MCP capabilities.
  • Application-search development and diagnosis against Meilisearch.
Not ideal for
  • Users who need a fully reviewed MCP100 recommendation today
  • Teams outside the publisher ecosystem or without least-privilege credentials
Avoid when
  • Permissions, credentials, and connected data cannot be tested with least privilege
  • The connected identity is broader than the task requires
  • Tool calls cannot be reviewed before consequential mutations
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

Perplexity · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

ecosystem:meilisearch · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Jul 30, 2026

Package: Jul 27, 2026

Repo: Jul 29, 2026

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

2,442

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

194

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

30-day package downloads

93,274

30-day package downloads · checked 2026-07-29T17:30:00.000Z

No reliable download data
External adoption evidence
  • zPlatform: Weekly downloads: 19,692zPlatform: Weekly downloads · Weekly · checked 2026-07-20T08:05:31.779ZEvidence source ↗
  • npm: package downloads: 93,274Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-07-29T17:30:00.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 2,442Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 194Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationFollow only the publisher source; credential storage, scopes, and revocation remain under review.The official server uses a configured Meilisearch host and API key.
CostPublisher plans, API usage, infrastructure, or per-action charges may apply; MCP100 has not published a cost conclusion.The MCP integration has no separately verified MCP100 price conclusion. Publisher subscriptions, API usage, compute, storage, and AI-client charges may apply.
PermissionsExact permissions and read/write boundaries have not completed MCP100 review.Meilisearch API-key permissions determine index and document operations.
Data handlingCandidate-specific retention, subprocess, telemetry, and model-data behavior remain review items.Authorized service data and tool results pass through the MCP server to the connected AI client. Review the publisher and client data policies before using sensitive search & research information.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Publisher attribution supports discovery, but does not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
  • Write-enabled keys can alter indexes or documents; use search-only keys for investigation.
Risk contextUse a test account, least privilege, read-only controls where available, and explicit approval for mutations.Write-enabled keys can alter indexes or documents; use search-only keys for investigation. Use a test environment where practical, least-privilege credentials, narrowly enabled tools, and explicit confirmation for mutations. MCP100 did not execute third-party server code during this documentation review.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-07-242026-07-30
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →