Field-by-field comparison
Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.
Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.
| Evidence field | RufloWatchlist candidate | Chrome DevTools MCPMCP100 Selected |
|---|---|---|
| Task fit | ||
| Best for |
|
|
| Not ideal for |
|
|
| Avoid when |
|
|
| Provenance | ||
| Provenance details | First-party MCP github:ruflo-app · Publisher source ↗ | Community implementation io.github.ChromeDevTools · Publisher source ↗ |
| Maintenance | ||
| Maintenance details | Stale Repo: Not documented Package: Not documented | Repo: Aug 14, 2026 Package: Aug 10, 2026 |
| Popularity evidence | ||
| GitHub stars | Not documented | 49,168 GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z |
| Package downloads / 30 days | No reliable download data | 7,541,930 package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z |
| External adoption evidence | Not documented |
|
| Client coverage | ||
| Client coverage details | Not documented | Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio |
| Client coverage note | Local stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server. | |
| Access and data | ||
| Authentication | Depends on the selected Ruflo deployment, model providers and integrated services; exact secrets must be bound from project/local evidence. | No server authentication is documented for local stdio. Running-browser connections support optional WebSocket headers; an open remote-debugging port lets local applications control Chrome. |
| Cost | Open-source framework; model/API/infrastructure costs depend on configured providers. | The open-source npm package lists no MCP fee. Chrome, Node.js, client, model, and external-service costs are separate. |
| Permissions | Potentially broad coding/project execution authority across orchestrated agents and integrations. | Inspects, debugs, automates, and modifies browser state through navigation, input, script evaluation, screenshots, uploads, extensions, memory, performance, and PWA tools. |
| Data handling | Project code, agent memory and orchestration context can flow through configured model/providers and persistence layers. | Browser content is exposed to the connected client. Performance tools send trace URLs to Google CrUX by default, and usage statistics with invocation success, latency, and environment data are enabled by default; broader retention is not documented. |
| Limitations | ||
| Tradeoffs |
|
|
| Risk context | Broad agent execution/orchestration and rapid evolution create a substantially larger trust surface than a narrow read-only MCP. | Can expose sensitive browser sessions and execute arbitrary browser actions or scripts. Use isolated profiles, URL allow/block patterns, restricted file paths, and do not expose remote-debugging ports. |
| Evidence date | ||
| Editorial review | 2026-09-13T00:00:00Z | 2026-08-11 |
| Candidate evidence | 2026-09-13T00:00:00Z | 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z |
Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.
Read the evidence method →