Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldSentry MCPMCP100 SelectedMCP Server for WinDbg Crash AnalysisMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Human-in-the-loop issue, event, trace, and performance investigation
  • Coding agents working on one constrained Sentry project
  • Teams using the supported hosted OAuth service
  • Opening crash dumps and querying debugger analysis, stacks, modules, and symbols through WinDbg/CDB
Not ideal for
  • General-purpose Sentry administration
  • Unattended remediation against production
  • Self-hosted users unwilling to configure tokens and optional LLM providers
  • Cross-platform debugging, live application observability, or root-cause conclusions without symbol and source validation
Avoid when
  • Error payloads may contain secrets or personal data that cannot be shown to the model/client
  • You cannot constrain the session to the intended organization/project
  • The requested OAuth scopes or write-capable skills exceed policy
  • Crash dumps may contain secrets or memory content that cannot be exposed to the connected AI client
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

Sentry · Publisher source ↗

Community implementation

io.github.svnscha · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Jul 2, 2026

Repo: Jul 20, 2026

Package: Jul 16, 2026

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

818

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

1,519

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

30-day package downloads

388,760

30-day package downloads · checked 2026-07-29T17:30:00.000Z

3,088

PyPI Stats package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

External adoption evidence
  • npm: package downloads: 388,760Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-07-29T17:30:00.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 818Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • github: repository stars: 1,519Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
  • PyPI Stats: package downloads: 3,088Non-comparable contextual signal.PyPI Stats: package downloads · Provider last month · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude CodeStreamable HTTP
Claude DesktopStreamable HTTP
CodexStreamable HTTP
VS CodeStreamable HTTP
CursorStreamable HTTP
OpenCodeStreamable HTTP
Claude CodeLocal stdio
Claude DesktopLocal stdio
CodexLocal stdio
VS CodeLocal stdio
CursorLocal stdio
OpenCodeLocal stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationThe hosted service uses MCP OAuth layered over Sentry OAuth; raw Sentry credentials stay server-side. Stdio uses a Sentry user auth token and may also require OpenAI or Anthropic credentials for AI-powered search.Stdio has no separate authentication. The documented HTTP transport has no authentication; the publisher recommends localhost, SSH tunneling, or an authenticating reverse proxy.
CostThe repository is source-available under its published license and the hosted MCP has no separately documented fee in the reviewed sources. Normal Sentry plan/usage, Seer, and external LLM-provider charges may apply.The MIT-licensed server lists no MCP fee. Windows Debugging Tools and symbol-network use are external requirements.
PermissionsHosted OAuth requests org:read, project:write, team:write, and event:write upstream, then narrows exposed actions through granted MCP skills and optional /mcp/:org/:project resource paths. Stdio documentation lists org/project/team read/write and event write token scopes.Launches CDB or KD, reads crash dumps, attaches to user-mode remote and kernel targets, runs arbitrary WinDbg or KD commands, and can interrupt live sessions.
Data handlingIssue, event, trace, release, team, project, and related telemetry may be returned to the MCP client. Hosted mode stores upstream OAuth credentials in encrypted grant properties and gives the client a separate MCP token. AI search tools may process query/event context through configured model infrastructure.Dump contents, symbol paths, commands, and outputs can be returned to the client or model. Filter scripts can redact text before it leaves the host; symbol retrieval may use Microsoft symbol services. Retention is not documented.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • The hosted server keeps upstream Sentry credentials server-side and narrows sessions by skills and paths, but requests broad upstream scopes.
  • AI-powered natural-language search may invoke an embedded model/provider; stdio self-hosting requires separate provider keys for those tools.
  • Self-hosted Sentry may lack features such as Seer and needs explicit skill disabling.
  • It speeds repetitive debugger queries, but depends on Windows debugging tools and symbol quality and AI summaries can misinterpret low-level evidence.
Risk contextProduction error telemetry often contains sensitive values, while upstream OAuth scopes include write capabilities. Prefer a project-constrained hosted URL, minimal granted skills, human approval for mutations, and prior telemetry scrubbing.Crash dumps can contain secrets or PII, and arbitrary debugger or kernel commands can affect live systems. Keep HTTP loopback-only or behind authentication, use redaction filters, and supervise remote and kernel sessions.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-07-242026-08-11
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →