Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldTaisly Agent KitWatchlist candidateFigma MCPMCP100 Selected
Task fit
Best for
  • Using the repository's documented social-media posting workflow from an MCP-compatible agent
  • Turning selected Figma frames into implementation context
  • Design-system teams using variables, components, and Code Connect
  • Human-supervised creation or modification of native Figma content
Not ideal for
  • Unattended campaigns, bulk engagement, moderation, or analytics requiring official platform guarantees
  • MCP clients outside Figma's supported catalog
  • Teams expecting one-click pixel-perfect production code
  • Headless automation that cannot complete user OAuth
Avoid when
  • Account credentials, draft content, audience selection, or platform-policy compliance cannot be reviewed before publishing
  • Proprietary design content cannot be exposed to the selected AI client or model
  • Canvas writes cannot be reviewed before execution
  • A stable long-term zero-cost commitment is required
Provenance
Provenance details

Community implementation

io.github.taisly · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

Figma · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Jul 6, 2026

Package: Jul 6, 2026

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
GitHub stars

255

GitHub stars · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

Not documented
30-day package downloads

589

30-day package downloads · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z

No reliable download data
External adoption evidence
  • github: repository stars: 255Exact attributable signal.github: repository stars · Admission snapshot · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Not documented
Client coverage
Client coverage details
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationRemote HTTP uses OAuth. Local setup stores a Taisly agent credential or uses TAISLY_API_KEY in ~/.taisly/config.json.The recommended remote server at https://mcp.figma.com/mcp uses user OAuth. Desktop mode relies on the signed-in Figma desktop application and its local endpoint.
CostThe package is free to install and has a free starting tier without a credit card. Paid plans exist, but exact prices are not in the reviewed README.Figma documents the MCP feature as free during its current beta and says it is expected to become usage-based paid. Underlying Figma plans and plan-specific features may also apply.
PermissionsConnects social accounts and validates, publishes, schedules, lists, and checks videos across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, X, Facebook, and other connected platforms. Local mode can read local videos.OAuth grants access to authorized Figma resources. Available tools can read design context and, in supported workflows, create or modify canvas content. Desktop mode can also serve or download image and SVG assets.
Data handlingRemote mode sends public video URLs, captions, schedules, account identifiers, and posting requests through Taisly and social platforms. Local stdio reads local video files; retention is not documented.The remote service retrieves design nodes, components, variables, layouts, and potentially Make or Code Connect resources and returns them to the MCP client. Desktop mode can write downloaded assets into the local project.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • A shared posting interface can reduce repetitive work, but credential handling and irreversible public actions create account, reputation, privacy, and platform-policy risk.
  • The hosted endpoint is easiest to connect and has the broadest feature set, but authorized design context passes through Figma and the connected AI workflow.
  • The desktop server is locally reachable through the Figma app, but it is intended for narrower organization and enterprise use cases.
  • Code Connect can improve component reuse but requires additional design-system setup.
Risk contextPosting and scheduling create external account changes. Follow the documented authenticate, validate, confirm, create flow; posts:create requires confirmed:true, and destinations, captions, and schedules need review.Private designs can be disclosed through tool results, and write-enabled tools can change shared design files. Restrict accessible files, review OAuth consent, require confirmation for writes, and inspect downloaded assets before committing them.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-08-112026-07-24
Candidate evidence2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z2026-07-29T20:58:26.000Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →