Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldTypeform MCPShortlist candidateSalesforce Hosted MCPMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Create and operate Typeform forms, automations, contacts, and analytics
  • Typeform users who need to create and operate typeform forms, automations, contacts, and analytics.
  • Connect compatible AI clients to Salesforce's documented MCP capabilities.
Not ideal for
  • The server exposes destructive form/contact operations and publishing actions. Feature access is plan-dependent. Use the correct regional endpoint for EU data-center accounts.
  • Users who need a fully reviewed MCP100 recommendation today
Avoid when
  • The server exposes destructive form/contact operations and publishing actions. Feature access is plan-dependent. Use the correct regional endpoint for EU data-center accounts.
  • Permissions, credentials, and connected data cannot be tested with least privilege
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

Typeform · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

Salesforce · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Popularity evidence
Client coverage
Client coverage detailsNot documented
Claude Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Claude Desktop✓ Streamable HTTP
Codex✓ Streamable HTTP
VS Code✓ Streamable HTTP
Cursor✓ Streamable HTTP
OpenCode✓ Streamable HTTP
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationOAuth 2.0. Typeform documents three region-specific MCP endpoints; the two EU endpoints are not interchangeable. Personal access tokens are not supported for current MCP connections.Follow only the publisher source; credential storage, scopes, and revocation remain under review.
CostNo separate MCP fee is documented. Typeform offers a free plan and paid plans; access to some MCP-backed product features is plan-dependent.Publisher plans, API usage, infrastructure, or per-action charges may apply; MCP100 has not published a cost conclusion.
PermissionsEach tool declares required scopes and product-plan access is enforced at call time. Typeform currently requires users to grant all MCP-supported scopes when connecting; users cannot customize a smaller scope set.Exact permissions and read/write boundaries have not completed MCP100 review.
Data handlingNot documented in the reviewed sources. The reviewed Typeform MCP pages do not state an MCP-specific retention or training policy.Candidate-specific retention, subprocess, telemetry, and model-data behavior remain review items.
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • Shortlist evidence is sufficient for identity, setup and task value; authenticated runtime tool-schema measurement and exhaustive security certification remain out of scope.
  • Publisher attribution supports discovery, but does not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
Risk contextThe MCP has broad write capability: it can create, patch, publish, duplicate and delete forms; modify themes and automations; and create/update/delete contact data and mappings. Typeform marks destructive tools that cannot be undone.Use a test account, least privilege, read-only controls where available, and explicit approval for mutations.
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-10-192026-07-24
Candidate evidence2026-10-202026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →