Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Typeform MCPtableau

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Comparable alternatives

Azure MCP ServerMCP100 RecommendedChrome DevTools MCPMCP100 RecommendedContext7 MCPMCP100 RecommendedGrafana Cloud MCPMCP100 RecommendedGoogle MCP Toolbox for DatabasesMCP100 RecommendedPlaywright MCPMCP100 Recommended

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence field	Typeform MCPShortlist candidate	tableauMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for	Create and operate Typeform forms, automations, contacts, and analytics Typeform users who need to create and operate typeform forms, automations, contacts, and analytics.	Business-intelligence discovery and analysis using authorized Tableau content.
Not ideal for	The server exposes destructive form/contact operations and publishing actions. Feature access is plan-dependent. Use the correct regional endpoint for EU data-center accounts.	Teams outside the publisher ecosystem or without least-privilege credentials
Avoid when	The server exposes destructive form/contact operations and publishing actions. Feature access is plan-dependent. Use the correct regional endpoint for EU data-center accounts.	The connected identity is broader than the task requires Tool calls cannot be reviewed before consequential mutations
Provenance
Provenance details	First-party MCP Typeform · Publisher source ↗	First-party MCP ecosystem:tableau · Publisher source ↗
Maintenance
Maintenance details	Repo: Not documented Package: Not documented	Repo: Sep 24, 2026 Package: Not documented
Popularity evidence
GitHub stars	Not documented	345 GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-24T04:14:47.698000Z
Client coverage
Client coverage details	Not documented	Claude Code✓ Local stdio Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio Codex✓ Local stdio VS Code✓ Local stdio Cursor✓ Local stdio OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage note	Local stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
Authentication	OAuth 2.0. Typeform documents three region-specific MCP endpoints; the two EU endpoints are not interchangeable. Personal access tokens are not supported for current MCP connections.	The official package documents Tableau authentication and server connection configuration.
Cost	No separate MCP fee is documented. Typeform offers a free plan and paid plans; access to some MCP-backed product features is plan-dependent.	The MCP integration has no separately verified MCP100 price conclusion. Publisher subscriptions, API usage, compute, storage, and AI-client charges may apply.
Permissions	Each tool declares required scopes and product-plan access is enforced at call time. Typeform currently requires users to grant all MCP-supported scopes when connecting; users cannot customize a smaller scope set.	Tableau site roles, content permissions, and connected-data policies determine what the server can return.
Data handling	Not documented in the reviewed sources. The reviewed Typeform MCP pages do not state an MCP-specific retention or training policy.	Authorized service data and tool results pass through the MCP server to the connected AI client. Review the publisher and client data policies before using sensitive analytics & data information.
Limitations
Tradeoffs	Shortlist evidence is sufficient for identity, setup and task value; authenticated runtime tool-schema measurement and exhaustive security certification remain out of scope.	Workbook metadata and query results may expose business-sensitive information or inherited data access.
Risk context	The MCP has broad write capability: it can create, patch, publish, duplicate and delete forms; modify themes and automations; and create/update/delete contact data and mappings. Typeform marks destructive tools that cannot be undone.	Workbook metadata and query results may expose business-sensitive information or inherited data access. Use a test environment where practical, least-privilege credentials, narrowly enabled tools, and explicit confirmation for mutations. MCP100 did not execute third-party server code during this documentation review.
Evidence date
Editorial review	2026-10-19	2026-07-30
Candidate evidence	2026-10-20	2026-09-24T04:25:05.554391Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →