Field-by-field comparison

Compare the evidence before choosing an MCP.

Each signal stays separate, missing facts remain visible, and the column order follows your selection.

MCPs in this comparison

Uncheck an MCP to remove it. Comparing two or three keeps each signal in its own row.

Open canonical comparison link

Comparable alternatives

Shown only when capability or industry context overlaps.

Side-by-side MCP evidence comparison
Evidence fieldZapier MCPShortlist candidateCodebase Memory MCPMCP100 Recommended
Task fit
Best for
  • Let an AI client execute selected Zapier actions across connected apps
  • Zapier users who need to let an ai client execute selected zapier actions across connected apps.
  • Repository indexing, symbol search, call-path tracing, impact analysis, and architecture queries across many languages
Not ideal for
  • Each user/server has a generated secure URL and a user-selected action set, so there is no universal endpoint or fixed tool count. Actions can create broad external side effects across connected services and should be narrowly scoped and confirmed.
  • Tiny repositories, one-off text searches, or semantic questions unsupported by the indexed parsers
Avoid when
  • Each user/server has a generated secure URL and a user-selected action set, so there is no universal endpoint or fixed tool count. Actions can create broad external side effects across connected services and should be narrowly scoped and confirmed.
  • The source tree cannot be indexed locally or persistent cache files are prohibited
Provenance
Provenance details

First-party MCP

Zapier · Publisher source ↗

First-party MCP

DeusData · Publisher source ↗

Maintenance
Maintenance details

Repo: Not documented

Package: Not documented

Repo: Aug 14, 2026

Package: Aug 14, 2026

Popularity evidence
GitHub starsNot documented

44,904

GitHub stars · checked 2026-09-25T18:35:00Z

Package downloads / 30 daysNo reliable download data

28,000

package downloads / 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T00:00:00.000Z

Shared repository stars

443

Shared repository stars (not MCP-specific) · checked 2026-10-20

Not documented
External adoption evidenceNot documented
  • npm: package downloads: 28,015Exact attributable signal.npm: package downloads · Rolling 30 days · checked 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000ZEvidence source ↗
Client coverage
Client coverage detailsNot documented
Claude Code✓ Local stdio
Claude Desktop✓ Local stdio
Codex✓ Local stdio
VS Code✓ Local stdio
Cursor✓ Local stdio
OpenCode✓ Local stdio
Client coverage noteLocal stdio runs on your computer. Streamable HTTP connects to a remotely hosted MCP server.
Access and data
AuthenticationThe user creates/connects a Zapier MCP server and signs in to Zapier from the MCP client; Zapier manages connected-app credentials behind the selected tools.local stdio; no remote auth needed
CostEach successful Zapier MCP tool call uses two tasks from the Zapier plan allowance; failed tool calls do not consume tasks. Zapier also has free and paid plans.none beyond local resources
PermissionsEach MCP server exposes a user-selected set of Zapier actions rather than a universal fixed tool set. A fixed tool bundle can be used for tightly scoped access.reads indexed source/project data; installer writes supported agent/editor configs/hooks
Data handlingZapier handles the credentials and rate limits for connected apps. The reviewed MCP page does not state a separate MCP-specific prompt/result retention or training policy.local processing; current docs state no source/index/query/env/telemetry upload
Limitations
Tradeoffs
  • First-party documentation establishes Zapier MCP, its dynamic secure URL model, and cross-app action scope. Exact tool inventory is user-configured, and runtime context footprint remains unmeasured.
  • Persistent indexing can reduce repeated reads, but consumes local storage and graph results can become stale until the repository is re-indexed.
  • Version 0.10.8 includes correctness and reliability fixes affecting graph/search results and Windows behavior.
Risk contextZapier MCP can create broad external side effects across connected services—for example sending messages, creating records/events/issues, or triggering other app actions. The actual risk depends on the configured action set.latest 0.10.x supported; SLSA/Sigstore/checksums/VirusTotal/security policy
Evidence date
Editorial review2026-10-192026-09-23
Candidate evidence2026-10-202026-09-25T18:35:00Z

Popularity, maintenance, fit, permissions, and client support are independent evidence fields.

Read the evidence method →