Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow changes to MCP-server benchmark coverage and telemetry-based detection so tracking accurately reflects released capabilities, without attributing the unreleased prevention component.
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Enterprise AI-agent security research, telemetry and detector evaluation.
What we know
Uber's open-source research system for discovering AI tools, collecting agent telemetry and evaluating risky behavior.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- Observed (UTC)chore(deps): bump urllib3 from 2.5.0 to 2.8.0 in /Detection ( 158)
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Endpoint inspection and telemetry collection at component level. Writes: Writes evaluation/report artifacts.
- Model-provider auth
- Sensitive access: Enterprise agent telemetry, Endpoint inventory
- Agent telemetry and security-analysis data are sensitive; keep deployments controlled and treat detector outputs as research signals.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
Popularity
1,848 repository stars
Stars observed Oct 6, 2026.
All limitations / Review context
Which MCP attack scenarios and endpoint inventory integrations are reproducible in the released detector, and has prevention actually been published?
The bounded assessment reviewed the official README, repository notices, security policy path, and security page for known material public-tracking blockers. No such blocker was identified. This is a public-tracking assessment, not an installation safety certification.
- Agent telemetry and security-analysis data are sensitive; keep deployments controlled and treat detector outputs as research signals.
- Endpoint inspection and telemetry collection at component level.
- Model-provider auth
- Agent intent/tool traces and endpoint inventory may be collected.
- Reviewed write actions: Writes evaluation/report artifacts
- Sensitive access: Enterprise agent telemetry, Endpoint inventory
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- A project-specific SECURITY.md policy was not available at the fetched official path; the review remains limited to published repository notices.
- The prevention component is not included in the current open-source release; endpoint telemetry requires a separate privacy and deployment review before use.
- No installation, runtime, client matrix, or complete tool-contract audit was performed in this review.
- The fetched official SECURITY.md path returned HTTP 404; it was not treated as positive evidence.
- Open-source release does not include prevention.
- Detection docs warn about isolated/non-production use.
- Model-backed detector workflows may require paid API keys.
Original activity observations
- 2026-10-05T08:28:40Z: chore(deps): bump urllib3 from 2.5.0 to 2.8.0 in /Detection ( 158)
Technical identity
github.com/uber/adr- Exact implementation source
- https://github.com/uber/adr ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- Testing / Debugging
- Repository identity
- uber/ADR
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- GitHub repository ↗
uber/adr
Recorded repository material and project history.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
Setup · Watchlist
Testing / Debugging setup
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructionsUber ADR is a research/detection repository; not an installable MCP server. Only show upstream research/prototype setup, not a client MCP registration.
publisher setup entry · Publisher instructions
git clone https://github.com/uber/ADR cd ADR/Detection uv syncConfigure / authenticate
MCP100 setup guideResearch/detection repository. Use source setup for the Detection subproject only; no standalone MCP endpoint or install command exists.
Check connection
Suggested checkRun the documented local detector example against non-sensitive test material; no MCP connection should be expected.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
Suggested checkUber ADR is an enterprise AI security/detection system, not a standalone MCP server. Stop its collector/detector in the deployment environment and remove the research checkout/venv only after preserving needed evaluation artifacts. No `claude mcp remove ADR` registration is implied.
Client unregistration, program uninstall, persistent-data deletion, and credential revocation must be treated separately.
What it does
Uber's open-source research system for discovering AI tools, collecting agent telemetry and evaluating risky behavior.
- Capability
- Security & Testing
- Resource type
- Testing / Debugging
- Industry
- Cybersecurity
- Best fit
- Enterprise AI-agent security research, telemetry and detector evaluation.
Representative uses
- Inventory AI applications/agents/MCP servers
- Capture agent tool-use telemetry
- Run security benchmarks
- Evaluate suspicious sessions
Limitations
- Open-source release does not include prevention.
- Detection docs warn about isolated/non-production use.
- Model-backed detector workflows may require paid API keys.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Model-provider auth
- Permissions
- Endpoint inspection and telemetry collection at component level.
- Data handling
- Agent intent/tool traces and endpoint inventory may be collected.
- Cost
- usage_based
- Risk and cautions
- Agent telemetry and security-analysis data are sensitive; keep deployments controlled and treat detector outputs as research signals.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Writes evaluation/report artifacts
- Sensitive access
- Enterprise agent telemetry Endpoint inventory
- Risk level
- high
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-06. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What authentication is documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
What cost model is recorded?
Is this an official MCP?
Uber is listed as First-party MCP in MCP100’s current evidence.