Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow-up value is specific to Structured page annotations and visual feedback for coding agents: Does element feedback retain accurate source targeting when the page changes between annotation and agent edits?
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Turning browser visual feedback into structured tasks for coding agents.
What we know
Local MCP + HTTP server connecting Agentation visual annotations to coding agents, with session/state management and watch workflows.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- agentation-mcp 1.3.2 published 2026-09-22T02:42:22.112Z
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Annotation/session state only. Writes: Create/update/delete annotation state; Acknowledge/resolve/dismiss/reply.
- Authentication not yet verified.
- Sensitive access: Page annotations, Feedback sessions
- Local-by-default and comparatively narrow, but remote binding or webhook delivery widens exposure.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
Popularity
· 356.8k package downloads / 30 days
Downloads observed Sep 25, 2026.
Do not overwrite existing reviewed stars/download metrics with nulls from this enrichment batch.
Do not overwrite existing reviewed stars/download metrics with nulls from this enrichment batch.
All limitations / Review context
Does element feedback retain accurate source targeting when the page changes between annotation and agent edits?
The bounded review of the publisher's documented Structured page annotations and visual feedback for coding agents and release notices identified no disclosed material condition preventing an accurately scoped public tracking entry. The resource's operational permissions remain uncertainty; this assessment does not certify installation safety.
- Local-by-default and comparatively narrow, but remote binding or webhook delivery widens exposure.
- Annotation/session state only.
- State persists to local SQLite by default; configured webhooks can send event JSON externally.
- Reviewed write actions: Create/update/delete annotation state; Acknowledge/resolve/dismiss/reply
- Sensitive access: Page annotations, Feedback sessions
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- Runtime behavior, dependencies and undisclosed vulnerabilities were not independently audited.
- Documented tool authority and any remote data handling must be checked before installation or use.
- Tool inventory, client matrix and permissions completeness were not requirements for this Radar tracking review.
- Default HTTP service is loopback-only.
- Remote/container binding needs explicit host/CORS configuration.
- Webhooks are best-effort and add external data flow.
Original activity observations
- agentation-mcp 1.3.2 published 2026-09-22T02:42:22.112Z
Technical identity
npm/agentation-mcp- Exact implementation source
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/agentation-mcp ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- MCP Server
- Repository identity
- benjitaylor/agentation
- Package identity
- agentation-mcp
- Service endpoint
- http://localhost:4747
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- Package registry ↗
agentation-mcp
Recorded package identity, distribution or download evidence.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
- GitHub repository ↗
benjitaylor/agentation
Repository reference; implementation attribution is not established for every document.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
Setup · Watchlist
Install & Agents
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructionsThe `server` subcommand is required; `doctor` is publisher diagnostic; browser-origin checks are not authentication | Publisher npm README revisited on 2026-10-14; exact identity retained.
Reviewed setup example · Claude Code only · Publisher instructions
claude mcp add agentation -- npx -y agentation-mcp serverConfigure / authenticate
MCP100 setup guideInstall the browser-side Agentation runtime in the target app as described in its install guide. MCP registration alone does not activate browser annotations.
Check connection
Suggested check`npx agentation-mcp doctor` tests services; check client tools and browser annotation delivery separately.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guideIf registered by the publisher Claude Code example under `agentation`, run the provided unregister command; for a different MCP client or name, delete the actual client registration. Removing a local client entry is distinct from deleting a vendor account/token.
Remove named client registration · Claude Code only · MCP100 composed guide
claude mcp remove agentation
Official Documentation & Sources
What it does
Local MCP + HTTP server connecting Agentation visual annotations to coding agents, with session/state management and watch workflows.
- Capability
- Developer Tools
- Resource type
- MCP Server
- Best fit
- Turning browser visual feedback into structured tasks for coding agents.
Representative uses
- List sessions and pending annotations
- Acknowledge/resolve/dismiss/reply
- Watch new annotations
- Receive browser-toolbar annotation events
Limitations
- Default HTTP service is loopback-only.
- Remote/container binding needs explicit host/CORS configuration.
- Webhooks are best-effort and add external data flow.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Not documented in the reviewed sources
- Permissions
- Annotation/session state only.
- Data handling
- State persists to local SQLite by default; configured webhooks can send event JSON externally.
- Cost
- free
- Risk and cautions
- Local-by-default and comparatively narrow, but remote binding or webhook delivery widens exposure.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Create/update/delete annotation state Acknowledge/resolve/dismiss/reply
- Sensitive access
- Page annotations Feedback sessions
- Risk level
- moderate
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-07. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup and authentication are documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
Is this an official MCP?
Agentation is listed as First-party MCP in MCP100’s current evidence.