Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow-up value is specific to Agent harness orchestration with MCP swarm tools and library-safe APIs: Do in-process orchestration and MCP entrypoints keep authority and tool contracts aligned as the harness evolves?
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Building self-learning agent orchestration and multi-agent harness workflows.
What we know
Agent meta-harness for routing, orchestration, memory, MCP coordination, hooks/background workers and opt-in repair/evolution workflows.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- agentic-flow 2.1.3 published 2026-09-16T04:07:42.086Z
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: medium.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Broad host/project authority through configured agents/hooks. Writes: Generate/edit config; Autonomous code repair; Hook-driven project changes.
- Provider/tool-specific.
- Sensitive access: Source code, Agent memory, Provider credentials
- A broad orchestration framework whose effective risk is determined by enabled agents, hooks and command backends.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
Popularity
· 294.1k package downloads / 30 days
Downloads observed Sep 25, 2026.
Do not overwrite existing reviewed stars/download metrics with nulls from this enrichment batch.
Do not overwrite existing reviewed stars/download metrics with nulls from this enrichment batch.
All limitations / Review context
Do in-process orchestration and MCP entrypoints keep authority and tool contracts aligned as the harness evolves?
The bounded review of the publisher's documented Agent harness orchestration with MCP swarm tools and library-safe APIs and release notices identified no disclosed material condition preventing an accurately scoped public tracking entry. The resource's operational permissions remain uncertainty; this assessment does not certify installation safety.
- A broad orchestration framework whose effective risk is determined by enabled agents, hooks and command backends.
- Broad host/project authority through configured agents/hooks.
- Provider/tool-specific.
- Project context, memories and trajectories may persist locally.
- Reviewed write actions: Generate/edit config; Autonomous code repair; Hook-driven project changes
- Sensitive access: Source code, Agent memory, Provider credentials
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- Runtime behavior, dependencies and undisclosed vulnerabilities were not independently audited.
- Documented tool authority and any remote data handling must be checked before installation or use.
- Tool inventory, client matrix and permissions completeness were not requirements for this Radar tracking review.
- Documentation mixes stable/alpha generations.
- Autonomous repair and command hooks can modify code.
- Some advanced Darwin/evolution capabilities are explicitly opt-in.
Original activity observations
- agentic-flow 2.1.3 published 2026-09-16T04:07:42.086Z
Technical identity
npm/agentic-flow- Exact implementation source
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/agentic-flow ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- Framework
- Repository identity
- ruvnet/agentic-flow
- Package identity
- agentic-flow
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- Package registry ↗
agentic-flow
Recorded package identity, distribution or download evidence.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
- GitHub repository ↗
ruvnet/agentic-flow
Repository reference; implementation attribution is not established for every document.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
Setup · Watchlist
Framework setup
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install framework / project integration
Publisher instructionsAgent framework with optional MCP; `init` prepares project; do not present framework install as universal MCP registration | Publisher npm README revisited on 2026-10-14; exact identity retained.
Reviewed setup example · Publisher instructions
npx agentic-flow mcp startReviewed setup example · Publisher instructions
npx agentic-flow@alpha initReviewed setup example · Publisher instructions
npx agentic-flow@alpha mcp startConfigure / authenticate
MCP100 setup guideFramework with optional MCP subcommand; initialize project using `npx agentic-flow init` before use, and launch MCP only using its documented mode.
Previously reviewed @alpha channel client example; separate from default channel: Publisher example adds client server "claude-flow" with command npx and args ["agentic-flow@alpha","mcp","start"].
Check connection
Suggested checkCheck the framework MCP process starts and its tools appear in the chosen host, not just that init finished.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guideStop the application/SDK integration, remove its project package/configuration using the original installer, and remove any separately configured MCP connector. Not a universal standalone MCP server.
Official Documentation & Sources
What it does
Agent meta-harness for routing, orchestration, memory, MCP coordination, hooks/background workers and opt-in repair/evolution workflows.
- Capability
- AI & Reasoning
- Resource type
- Framework
- Best fit
- Building self-learning agent orchestration and multi-agent harness workflows.
Representative uses
- Initialize agent projects
- Run MCP orchestration
- Route tasks to agents
- Capture learning/repair data
Limitations
- Documentation mixes stable/alpha generations.
- Autonomous repair and command hooks can modify code.
- Some advanced Darwin/evolution capabilities are explicitly opt-in.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Provider/tool-specific.
- Permissions
- Broad host/project authority through configured agents/hooks.
- Data handling
- Project context, memories and trajectories may persist locally.
- Cost
- free
- Risk and cautions
- A broad orchestration framework whose effective risk is determined by enabled agents, hooks and command backends.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Generate/edit config Autonomous code repair Hook-driven project changes
- Sensitive access
- Source code Agent memory Provider credentials
- Risk level
- high
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-07. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup and authentication are documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
Is this an official MCP?
RUV / ruvnet is listed as First-party MCP in MCP100’s current evidence.