Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow-up value is specific to AGT name resolution and signature-bound manifests with optional writes: Do owner-signed session grants keep registry writes separate from default public name resolution?
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Resolve and verify .agt agent identities, signed manifests, endpoints and optional bounded record updates.
What we know
Agent-identity resolver that checks on-chain records and signature-verified manifests, returning third-party manifest content as untrusted data; optional local session grants can expose narrow record writes.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- @agtnames/mcp 1.5.2 published 2026-09-22T16:04:54.460Z
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Read public identity/manifest data; optional narrow record-write permissions bounded by grant. Writes: Optional on-chain text/address/endpoint/manifest/wallet record updates; Create/import/forget local session grant state.
- Public reads; optional countersigned session authority for writes.
- Sensitive access: Agent identity metadata, Endpoints/keys/payment metadata, Session key/passphrase for writes
- Default mode is read-oriented, but untrusted manifests and optional public-record writes require clear separation.
- Signature verification, URI allowlist, size/time caps and bounded grants are documented.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
All limitations / Review context
Do owner-signed session grants keep registry writes separate from default public name resolution?
The bounded review of the publisher's documented AGT name resolution and signature-bound manifests with optional writes and release notices identified no disclosed material condition preventing an accurately scoped public tracking entry. The resource's operational permissions remain uncertainty; this assessment does not certify installation safety.
- Default mode is read-oriented, but untrusted manifests and optional public-record writes require clear separation.
- Signature verification, URI allowlist, size/time caps and bounded grants are documented.
- Read public identity/manifest data; optional narrow record-write permissions bounded by grant.
- Public reads; optional countersigned session authority for writes.
- Reads public chain/IPFS/RPC data; manifest payloads are untrusted and bounded/sanitized.
- Reviewed write actions: Optional on-chain text/address/endpoint/manifest/wallet record updates; Create/import/forget local session grant state
- Sensitive access: Agent identity metadata, Endpoints/keys/payment metadata, Session key/passphrase for writes
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- Runtime behavior, dependencies and undisclosed vulnerabilities were not independently audited.
- Documented tool authority and any remote data handling must be checked before installation or use.
- Tool inventory, client matrix and permissions completeness were not requirements for this Radar tracking review.
- Third-party manifest content must not be treated as instructions.
- IPFS/RPC availability can prevent retrieval without disproving ownership.
- Hosted endpoint is read-only; optional local writes require explicit session grant/passphrase/gas.
- Hosted read-only and local optional-write modes must remain distinct.
Original activity observations
- @agtnames/mcp 1.5.2 published 2026-09-22T16:04:54.460Z
Technical identity
npm/@agtnames/mcp- Exact implementation source
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/@agtnames/mcp ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- MCP Server
- Repository identity
- agtnames/agt
- Package identity
- npm:@agtnames/mcp
- Service endpoint
- https://agtnames.com/api/mcp
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- Package registry ↗
@agtnames/mcp
Recorded package identity, distribution or download evidence.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
- GitHub repository ↗
agtnames/agt
Repository reference; implementation attribution is not established for every document.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
Setup · Watchlist
Install & Agents
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
MCP100 setup guidePublisher-documented install or connect path; prerequisites and any extra host configuration remain required.
publisher install or stdio launch · Publisher instructions
npx -y @agtnames/mcpreviewed install or registration · Claude Code only · MCP100 composed guide
claude mcp add agt -- npx -y @agtnames/mcpConfigure / authenticate
MCP100 setup guideAlternative hosted readonly endpoint https://agtnames.com/api/mcp. Local npx bridge requires no registration API key for basic use.
Check connection
Suggested checkPublisher commands: npx -y @agtnames/mcp --version; `claude mcp get agt` checks host connection.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guideIf registered in Claude Code under the name `agt`, remove the client entry with `claude mcp remove agt`. For other MCP hosts remove the matching server/connector in that host’s MCP settings. Remove a globally installed software package separately if applicable; this does not delete data or revoke a service credential.
Client removal, software uninstall, persistent-data deletion and credential revocation are separate actions.
Remove client registration · Claude Code only · MCP100 composed guide
claude mcp remove agt
Official Documentation & Sources
What it does
Agent-identity resolver that checks on-chain records and signature-verified manifests, returning third-party manifest content as untrusted data; optional local session grants can expose narrow record writes.
- Capability
- Security & Testing
- Resource type
- MCP Server
- Best fit
- Resolve and verify .agt agent identities, signed manifests, endpoints and optional bounded record updates.
Representative uses
- Resolve owner/expiry/records/manifest
- Inspect endpoints/capabilities/keys/pricing metadata
- Check name availability/namehash
- Optionally update bounded on-chain records with countersigned grants
Limitations
- Third-party manifest content must not be treated as instructions.
- IPFS/RPC availability can prevent retrieval without disproving ownership.
- Hosted endpoint is read-only; optional local writes require explicit session grant/passphrase/gas.
- Hosted read-only and local optional-write modes must remain distinct.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Public reads; optional countersigned session authority for writes.
- Permissions
- Read public identity/manifest data; optional narrow record-write permissions bounded by grant.
- Data handling
- Reads public chain/IPFS/RPC data; manifest payloads are untrusted and bounded/sanitized.
- Cost
- gas_for_writes
- Risk and cautions
- Default mode is read-oriented, but untrusted manifests and optional public-record writes require clear separation.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Optional on-chain text/address/endpoint/manifest/wallet record updates Create/import/forget local session grant state
- Sensitive access
- Agent identity metadata Endpoints/keys/payment metadata Session key/passphrase for writes
- Risk level
- moderate
- Security notes
- Signature verification, URI allowlist, size/time caps and bounded grants are documented.
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-08. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup and authentication are documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
What cost model is recorded?
Is this an official MCP?
AGT Names is listed as First-party MCP in MCP100’s current evidence.