MCP100 IndexCloud & DevOps
WatchlistFirst-party MCP

AISIX MCP Gateway

by API7.ai

Updated September 11, 2026

Cloud & DevOps

MCP100 verdict

Not currently recommended. Strong type-specific gateway design with per-caller tool grants, but production gateway control-plane risk still warrants Watchlist.

MCP100 Assessment

Editorial verdict

Strong type-specific gateway design with per-caller tool grants, but production gateway control-plane risk still warrants Watchlist.

Reviewed September 11, 2026

Task Fit

Mapped

Cloud operations

Trust

Status warning

Editorial trust review has not been completed.

Maintenance

Date unavailable

No dated repository or package update is currently stored.

Popularity

Signals unavailable

No independently comparable adoption metric is currently stored.

Best for

  • Organizations that want one MCP gateway to aggregate upstream servers and restrict tools per caller key
  • Teams that need a policy boundary in front of multiple MCP servers

Not ideal for

  • Small local setups that do not need a gateway layer
  • Production multi-tenant deployments before admin/operator controls are fully reviewed

Avoid if

  • Admin tokens or gateway configuration are broadly accessible
  • Caller keys are granted whole-server/all-tool access without a reason

Trade-offs

  • Per-key tool grants are a strong least-privilege primitive
  • A gateway becomes a central trust boundary for credentials, upstream routing, and tool availability

Evidence scope

Evidence

Current source snapshot

Popularity

No MCP-specific repository metric is stored

No MCP-specific package metric is stored

Stars observation date unavailable · Downloads observation date unavailable

Maintenance

Publisher activity observed September 11, 2026

Current source snapshot

Trust review

Source relationship: First-party MCP

Reviewed September 11, 2026