Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow desktop or hosted agent integrations as the console evolves
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Operating multiple coding/research agents with governed local tools
What we know
Cross-platform agent operator console with plugin-based browser, files, Git, shell, secrets, automation and a governed MCP tool surface.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- Observed (UTC)📝 Add release notes for v9.5.38
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Per-user tool access and plugin permissions. Writes: Shell commands; File/Git writes; Docker/Kubernetes operations; RPA flows.
- RBAC and user-scoped access.
- Sensitive access: Secrets, Source code, Browser sessions, Infrastructure
- BOSS intentionally gives agents real operator tools; RBAC, kill switches and secret scoping are essential.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
Popularity
804 repository stars
Stars observed Sep 25, 2026.
Preserve any already-reviewed adoption metrics in MCP100. Batch 4 did not refresh package downloads because the package-stats provider had insufficient credits.
Preserve any already-reviewed adoption metrics in MCP100. Batch 4 did not refresh package downloads because the package-stats provider had insufficient credits.
All limitations / Review context
Which MCP tools and workspace actions are currently supported?
The bounded assessment reviewed the official README, repository notices, security policy path, and security page for known material public-tracking blockers. No such blocker was identified. This is a public-tracking assessment, not an installation safety certification.
- BOSS intentionally gives agents real operator tools; RBAC, kill switches and secret scoping are essential.
- Per-user tool access and plugin permissions.
- RBAC and user-scoped access.
- Can access workstation files, terminals, browser state, secrets and infrastructure through enabled plugins.
- Reviewed write actions: Shell commands; File/Git writes; Docker/Kubernetes operations; RPA flows
- Sensitive access: Secrets, Source code, Browser sessions, Infrastructure
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- No independent runtime, installation, or comprehensive security audit was performed.
- No installation, runtime, client matrix, or complete tool-contract audit was performed in this review.
- Large tool surface can confer broad workstation/infrastructure authority.
- Shared/remote terminal features require strong access controls.
Original activity observations
- 2026-10-05T12:24:20Z: 📝 Add release notes for v9.5.38
Technical identity
github.com/risa-labs-inc/bossconsole- Exact implementation source
- https://github.com/risa-labs-inc/bossconsole ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- Host
- Repository identity
- risa-labs-inc/bossconsole
- Service endpoint
- http://127.0.0.1:7677
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- GitHub repository ↗
risa-labs-inc/bossconsole
Recorded repository material and project history.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
Setup · Watchlist
Host / Desktop app setup
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Download / install
Publisher instructionsBOSS Console is a desktop agent host with its own MCP/tool management.
package install · Publisher instructions
brew install --cask bossConfigure application / integrations
MCP100 setup guideInstall app with publisher releases or Homebrew, then use Toolbox → MCP to enable only tools you need. Refer to publisher Agents and MCP wiki for full host-specific workflow.
Check connection
Suggested checkLaunch BOSS Console and inspect Toolbox → MCP switches; do not run agent tools.
Disconnect / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guideIn BOSS Toolbox disable the installed tool/plugins and remove their integration from the workspace. To remove BOSS on macOS installed by Homebrew use `brew uninstall --cask boss`. This desktop agent host is not itself a standalone MCP server.
Client unregistration, program uninstall, persistent-data deletion, and credential revocation must be treated separately.
Package / application uninstall · matching installation environment · MCP100 composed guide
brew uninstall --cask boss
What it does
Cross-platform agent operator console with plugin-based browser, files, Git, shell, secrets, automation and a governed MCP tool surface.
- Capability
- Developer Tools
- Resource type
- Host
- Industry
- Software & Technology
- Best fit
- Operating multiple coding/research agents with governed local tools
Representative uses
- Run Claude/Codex/Gemini/OpenCode in shared terminals
- Expose browser/file/Git/shell tools
- Manage plugins and secrets
- Operate Docker/Kubernetes tools
Limitations
- Large tool surface can confer broad workstation/infrastructure authority.
- Shared/remote terminal features require strong access controls.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- RBAC and user-scoped access.
- Permissions
- Per-user tool access and plugin permissions.
- Data handling
- Can access workstation files, terminals, browser state, secrets and infrastructure through enabled plugins.
- Cost
- unknown
- Risk and cautions
- BOSS intentionally gives agents real operator tools; RBAC, kill switches and secret scoping are essential.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Shell commands File/Git writes Docker/Kubernetes operations RPA flows
- Sensitive access
- Secrets Source code Browser sessions Infrastructure
- Risk level
- high
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-06. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup and authentication are documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
Is this an official MCP?
RISA Labs is listed as First-party MCP in MCP100’s current evidence.