MCP100 verdict
Not currently recommended. Manage Neon Postgres projects, branches, databases, migrations, and queries.
MCP100 Assessment
Editorial verdict
Manage Neon Postgres projects, branches, databases, migrations, and queries.
Reviewed 2026-07-24 · Next review 2026-09-24
Task Fit
Mapped
Working with structured data
Trust
Status warning
tool_contract; install_supply_chain; advisory_freshness
Maintenance
Activity observed
A dated repository or package update is available; editorial maintenance review is still pending.
Popularity
Signals available
Visible usage signals are shown for discovery only, not as proof of safety.
Best for
- Manage Neon Postgres projects, branches, databases, migrations, and queries.
- Teams already using Neon that can test with non-sensitive data and least privilege.
Not ideal for
- Users who need an MCP100-selected recommendation today
- Unattended production workflows before permissions and failure behavior are reviewed
Avoid if
- The connected data or account cannot be safely exposed to the selected AI client
- You cannot verify least-privilege access and review write-capable tool calls
Trade-offs
- First-party provenance and a clear task improve confidence, but do not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
- Client transport compatibility does not prove that authentication, scopes, failure handling, and every tool behave safely.
Evidence scope
Evidence
Popularity
624 MCP repository stars
6.4k package downloads
Stars observed 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z · Downloads observed 2026-07-29T17:30:00.000Z
Exact implementation repository metric.
Exact implementation package metric.
Maintenance
Publisher activity observed 2026-08-13T20:51:43Z
Current source snapshot
Trust review
Source relationship: First-party MCP
Reviewed 2026-07-24 · Next review 2026-09-24