MCP100 verdict
Not currently recommended. Manage and query Pinecone indexes and search Pinecone documentation.
MCP100 Assessment
Editorial verdict
Manage and query Pinecone indexes and search Pinecone documentation.
Reviewed 2026-07-24 · Next review 2026-09-24
Task Fit
Mapped
Working with structured data
Trust
Status warning
maintenance_source_health; tool_contract; install_supply_chain; advisory_freshness
Maintenance
Activity observed
A dated repository or package update is available; editorial maintenance review is still pending.
Popularity
Signals available
Visible usage signals are shown for discovery only, not as proof of safety.
Best for
- Manage and query Pinecone indexes and search Pinecone documentation.
- Teams already using Pinecone that can test with non-sensitive data and least privilege.
Not ideal for
- Users who need an MCP100-selected recommendation today
- Unattended production workflows before permissions and failure behavior are reviewed
Avoid if
- The connected data or account cannot be safely exposed to the selected AI client
- You cannot verify least-privilege access and review write-capable tool calls
Trade-offs
- First-party provenance and a clear task improve confidence, but do not replace an independent permissions and usability review.
- Client transport compatibility does not prove that authentication, scopes, failure handling, and every tool behave safely.
Evidence scope
Evidence
Popularity
No MCP-specific repository metric is stored
2.1k package downloads
Stars observation date unavailable · Downloads observed 2026-07-29T17:30:00.000Z
No public repository is mapped to the reviewed MCP.
Exact implementation package metric.
Maintenance
Publisher activity observed 2026-02-05T22:54:50.537Z
Current source snapshot
Trust review
Source relationship: First-party MCP
Reviewed 2026-07-24 · Next review 2026-09-24