MCP100 verdict
Inspect SonarQube and SonarCloud projects, issues, quality gates, and security findings.
MCP100 Assessment
Editorial verdict
Inspect SonarQube and SonarCloud projects, issues, quality gates, and security findings.
Reviewed 2026-07-30 · Next review 2026-10-30
Task Fit
Mapped
Specialized workflows
Trust
Reviewed
A dated editorial review is published on the MCP detail page.
Maintenance
Activity observed
A dated repository or package update is available; editorial maintenance review is still pending.
Popularity
Signals available
Visible usage signals are shown for discovery only, not as proof of safety.
Best for
- Code-quality and application-security investigation with optional controlled project operations.
Not ideal for
- Teams outside the publisher ecosystem or without least-privilege credentials
Avoid if
- The connected identity is broader than the task requires
- Tool calls cannot be reviewed before consequential mutations
Trade-offs
- Source findings and code excerpts can be sensitive; mutation tools should remain disabled unless required.
Evidence scope
Evidence
Popularity
623 MCP repository stars
No MCP-specific package metric is stored
Stars observed 2026-08-14T18:46:26.000Z · Downloads observation date unavailable
No exact repository popularity metric was collected during this ecosystem review.
No exact package popularity metric was collected during this ecosystem review.
Maintenance
Publisher activity observed 2026-08-14T09:37:01Z
Current source snapshot
Trust review
Source relationship: First-party MCP
Reviewed 2026-07-30 · Next review 2026-10-30