Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow-up value is specific to Clarx local manifest scoring and optional hosted findings: Do local scoring rules remain attributable and clearly distinct from token-authenticated remote scan results?
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Scoring/validating agent instruction manifests and generating CI/readiness workflows.
What we know
Local MCP for scoring CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, validating clarx-manifest.json, generating CI workflows and optionally using Clarx Cloud/Anthropic for hosted AI or repository-scan functions.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- @clarxai/mcp 0.2.2 published 2026-08-19T16:17:21.278Z
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Local analysis plus optional org-scoped hosted findings/AI. Writes: Returns generated workflow/manifest text; no direct local file-write tool established.
- Optional Clarx token or Anthropic key.
- Sensitive access: Internal agent instructions, Repository findings, Cloud tokens
- Primarily analysis, but optional cloud/BYOK paths move repository instructions/data outside local boundary.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
All limitations / Review context
Do local scoring rules remain attributable and clearly distinct from token-authenticated remote scan results?
The bounded review of the publisher's documented Clarx local manifest scoring and optional hosted findings and release notices identified no disclosed material condition preventing an accurately scoped public tracking entry. The resource's operational permissions remain uncertainty; this assessment does not certify installation safety.
- Primarily analysis, but optional cloud/BYOK paths move repository instructions/data outside local boundary.
- Local analysis plus optional org-scoped hosted findings/AI.
- Optional Clarx token or Anthropic key.
- Core can remain local; hosted features send manifest/repository content to configured services.
- Reviewed write actions: Returns generated workflow/manifest text; no direct local file-write tool established
- Sensitive access: Internal agent instructions, Repository findings, Cloud tokens
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- Runtime behavior, dependencies and undisclosed vulnerabilities were not independently audited.
- Documented tool authority and any remote data handling must be checked before installation or use.
- Tool inventory, client matrix and permissions completeness were not requirements for this Radar tracking review.
- public repository identity
- Core scores are heuristics/ergonomics signals, not security/correctness guarantees.
- Hosted features are plan/scope limited.
- Repository content may be sent to Clarx or Anthropic when optional hosted/BYOK features are used.
- No public repo was proven.
Original activity observations
- @clarxai/mcp 0.2.2 published 2026-08-19T16:17:21.278Z
Technical identity
npm/@clarxai/mcp- Exact implementation source
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/@clarxai/mcp ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- MCP Server
- Package identity
- npm:@clarxai/mcp
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- Package registry ↗
@clarxai/mcp
Recorded package identity, distribution or download evidence.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
- Evidence source ↗
clarx.ai/
Source material retained for this review.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
Setup · Watchlist
Install & Agents
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructionsCore local checks versus hosted Clarx AI functions. CLARX_MCP_TOKEN unlocks cloud features; ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is an alternative BYOK for AI drafting.
publisher install or stdio launch · Claude Code only · Publisher instructions
claude mcp add clarx -- npx -y @clarxai/mcp@latestConfigure / authenticate
MCP100 setup guidePublisher `claude mcp add clarx -- npx -y @clarxai/mcp@latest`; CLARX_MCP_TOKEN is used for hosted AI/repository features and ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is optional BYOK alternative.
Previously reviewed client configuration / prerequisites: Distinguish keyless local manifest checks from hosted AI/data tools.
Check connection
Suggested checkUse read-only manifest or repo listing; avoid AI quota-consuming draft generation as validation.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guideFor a Claude Code registration named `clarxai-mcp`, run `claude mcp remove clarxai-mcp`; otherwise remove the exact entry in the chosen MCP client settings and restart/reconnect. This client-host removal command is MCP100-composed from Claude Code lifecycle documentation, not a vendor-authored uninstall. With `npx`, a separate global package uninstall normally is unnecessary. Do not delete provider data or credentials by default.
Client unregister, package uninstall, data deletion, and OAuth/API token/wallet permissions are distinct.
Remove client registration · Claude Code only · MCP100 composed guide
claude mcp remove clarxai-mcp
Official Documentation & Sources
What it does
Local MCP for scoring CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md, validating clarx-manifest.json, generating CI workflows and optionally using Clarx Cloud/Anthropic for hosted AI or repository-scan functions.
- Capability
- Developer Tools
- Resource type
- MCP Server
- Best fit
- Scoring/validating agent instruction manifests and generating CI/readiness workflows.
Representative uses
- Score/validate agent manifests
- Generate GitHub Actions score gate
- Suggest/draft manifest improvements
- Inspect Clarx-hosted repository findings when authenticated
Limitations
- Core scores are heuristics/ergonomics signals, not security/correctness guarantees.
- Hosted features are plan/scope limited.
- Repository content may be sent to Clarx or Anthropic when optional hosted/BYOK features are used.
- No public repo was proven.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Optional Clarx token or Anthropic key.
- Permissions
- Local analysis plus optional org-scoped hosted findings/AI.
- Data handling
- Core can remain local; hosted features send manifest/repository content to configured services.
- Cost
- plan_or_provider_based
- Risk and cautions
- Primarily analysis, but optional cloud/BYOK paths move repository instructions/data outside local boundary.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Returns generated workflow/manifest text; no direct local file-write tool established
- Sensitive access
- Internal agent instructions Repository findings Cloud tokens
- Risk level
- moderate
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-08. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup and authentication are documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
What cost model is recorded?
Is this an official MCP?
Clarx AI is listed as First-party MCP in MCP100’s current evidence.