MCP100 IndexMCP Server
WatchlistFirst-party MCP

Compartment

by MaxFreedomPollard

Reviewed October 5, 2026

MCP Server

Watchlist tracking

Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.

MCP100 Assessment

Watchlist / Tracking

Why we’re tracking it

Follow encryption, local-only storage, and client adapters as the vault evolves

Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested

Best fit

Encrypted offline persistent memory shared across local agent clients.

What we know

Offline encrypted memory vault with hybrid search, per-agent namespaces, auditability and a stdio MCP server.

Maintenance / activity evidence

  • Observed (UTC)Tests: the refresh test gives Hermes its own home on Windows too

Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.

Verification gaps / watch-outs

  • Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
  • Namespace rw/ro/none plus local process access. Writes: Store/forget/link memories; Import/export/install integrations.
  • Vault passphrase.
  • Sensitive access: Durable memories, Potential credentials stored as memory
  • Network exposure is low, but persistent memory can contain highly sensitive information.

Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.

Popularity

581 repository stars

Stars observed Sep 25, 2026.

Do not overwrite existing reviewed stars/download metrics with nulls from this enrichment batch.

Do not overwrite existing reviewed stars/download metrics with nulls from this enrichment batch.

All limitations / Review context

Which clients and vault operations remain supported without a hosted dependency?

The bounded assessment reviewed the official README, repository notices, security policy path, and security page for known material public-tracking blockers. No such blocker was identified. This is a public-tracking assessment, not an installation safety certification.

  • Network exposure is low, but persistent memory can contain highly sensitive information.
  • Namespace rw/ro/none plus local process access.
  • Vault passphrase.
  • Memories and embeddings are encrypted at rest; project states no runtime network/telemetry.
  • Reviewed write actions: Store/forget/link memories; Import/export/install integrations
  • Sensitive access: Durable memories, Potential credentials stored as memory
  • Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
  • No independent runtime, installation, or comprehensive security audit was performed.
  • No installation, runtime, client matrix, or complete tool-contract audit was performed in this review.
  • Python 3.11+ for pip route.
  • Plaintext export is intentionally unencrypted.
  • Optional memory-unlock tool is disabled by default because passphrases would enter model context.

Original activity observations

  • 2026-09-30T09:06:05Z: Tests: the refresh test gives Hermes its own home on Windows too
Technical identity
github.com/maxfreedompollard/compartment
Reviewed resource type
MCP Server
Repository identity
maxfreedompollard/compartment
Package identity
pypi:compartment

Evidence & Sources

Evidence basis
Recorded source evidence
Setup runtime verification
Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.

Reviewed · Latest source observation

  • GitHub repository ↗

    maxfreedompollard/compartment

    Recorded repository material and project history.

    Includes references whose attribution is not established.