Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
The documented gateway MCP integration has a limited-security-maintenance commitment and an elapsed planned archival date. One short follow-up is valuable to resolve actual support/archival status and avoid misleading users about the retired platform.
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Maintaining or evaluating the Grafbase Gateway/CLI
What we know
Rust repository for Grafbase Gateway and CLI components for GraphQL federation/routing; the prior Grafbase platform has been sunset.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- Observed (UTC)chore(gateway): release bump to address wolfi CVEs ( 3615)
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: medium.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Depends on deployed GraphQL configuration. Writes: Can route GraphQL mutations depending on upstream API.
- Deployment-specific.
- Sensitive access: GraphQL data
- Operational/lifecycle caveats are more material than an MCP-specific security model because this is not a standalone MCP server.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
Popularity
1,229 repository stars
Stars observed Oct 6, 2026.
No canonical package metric applied.
No canonical package metric applied.
No canonical package metric applied.
All limitations / Review context
Is the self-hosted MCP gateway still receiving the stated security maintenance, and has the overdue repository archival plan been completed?
The bounded assessment reviewed the official README, repository notices, security policy path, and security page for known material public-tracking blockers. No such blocker was identified. This is a public-tracking assessment, not an installation safety certification.
- Operational/lifecycle caveats are more material than an MCP-specific security model because this is not a standalone MCP server.
- Depends on deployed GraphQL configuration.
- Deployment-specific.
- Processes GraphQL/API traffic.
- Reviewed write actions: Can route GraphQL mutations depending on upstream API
- Sensitive access: GraphQL data
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- The official README announces a sunset and planned archive; this review records that lifecycle context without treating it as an installation or security certification.
- No independent runtime, installation, or comprehensive security audit was performed.
- The retained integration README is historical; the current retirement notice controls platform and support claims.
- Platform/dashboard sunset; gateway security-maintenance-only. The announced May archival date has elapsed but the fetched repository does not resolve an actual archival completion date. Do not borrow Hive successor capabilities.
- No MCP-specific server identity established
- Package identity
- Current successor mapping
- Repository states platform/dashboard/app are sunset.
- Gateway/CLI were in maintenance mode with archival plans.
Original activity observations
- 2026-05-11T12:06:09Z: chore(gateway): release bump to address wolfi CVEs ( 3615)
Technical identity
github.com/grafbase/grafbase- Exact implementation source
- https://github.com/grafbase/grafbase ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- Framework
- Repository identity
- grafbase/grafbase
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- GitHub repository ↗
grafbase/grafbase
Recorded repository material and project history.
Setup · Watchlist
Framework setup
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructionsPublisher-specific setup path. Follow prerequisites, then register or connect to your MCP host.
publisher documented install or connect · Publisher instructions
npx grafbase mcp <YOUR_GRAPHQL_API_URL>Configure / authenticate
Publisher instructionsGrafbase CLI exposes a local MCP endpoint, default http://127.0.0.1:5000/mcp; alternatively enable Grafbase Gateway `[mcp] enabled = true` in grafbase.toml.
Check connection
Suggested checkVerify the client can list the target GraphQL schema tools; endpoint reachability alone is not complete API auth verification.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guideRemove the local endpoint from client config, stop `grafbase mcp` process, or disable Gateway `[mcp]` setting if using Gateway mode.
What it does
Rust repository for Grafbase Gateway and CLI components for GraphQL federation/routing; the prior Grafbase platform has been sunset.
- Capability
- Developer Tools
- Resource type
- Framework
- Industry
- Software & Technology
- Best fit
- Maintaining or evaluating the Grafbase Gateway/CLI
Representative uses
- Run the Grafbase Gateway
- Use the Grafbase CLI
- Maintain GraphQL federation components
Limitations
- Repository states platform/dashboard/app are sunset.
- Gateway/CLI were in maintenance mode with archival plans.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Deployment-specific.
- Permissions
- Depends on deployed GraphQL configuration.
- Data handling
- Processes GraphQL/API traffic.
- Cost
- unknown
- Risk and cautions
- Operational/lifecycle caveats are more material than an MCP-specific security model because this is not a standalone MCP server.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Can route GraphQL mutations depending on upstream API
- Sensitive access
- GraphQL data
- Risk level
- moderate
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-06. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup and authentication are documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
Is this an official MCP?
The Guild (acquired Grafbase) is listed as Ecosystem official in MCP100’s current evidence.