Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Dated implementation activity and relevant MCP role justify continued Radar monitoring.
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Build governed agents with MCP capability integration
What we know
Production-oriented agent framework with packages for tool contracts, MCP gateway abstractions, policy, execution and testing.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- GitHub REST repository pushed_at 2026-09-04T06:52:51Z for CodeSoul-co/Hypha
Tracking evidence observed Oct 9, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: medium.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Framework can execute governed tool calls according to application integration Reported action classes: Framework can execute governed tool calls according to application integration. Complete write authority is not verified.
- Application-defined providers and gateway credentials
- Sensitive access: Application tools, Trace data
- Risk determined by host app policy and connected MCP tools
- Framework privileges are inherited from connected tools, agent configuration and runtime; do not label as stand-alone server.
- Framework executes bounded tools and MCP adapters; secret references, policy approvals and sandbox/workspace configuration are deployment-specific.
- Unknown vulnerabilities and client-side tool approvals were not exhaustively evaluated.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
Popularity
447 shared-repository stars
Stars observed Oct 9, 2026.
Repository total for CodeSoul-co/Hypha; not package-specific.
All limitations / Review context
At the next review, has this exact implementation gained new releases, changed setup/security scope, or become suitable for Shortlist?
No verified blocker to PUBLIC RADAR TRACKING within the bounded first-party evidence reviewed; material permissions and mitigations are explicitly disclosed.
- Risk determined by host app policy and connected MCP tools
- Framework privileges are inherited from connected tools, agent configuration and runtime; do not label as stand-alone server.
- Framework executes bounded tools and MCP adapters; secret references, policy approvals and sandbox/workspace configuration are deployment-specific.
- Framework can execute governed tool calls according to application integration
- Application-defined providers and gateway credentials
- Depends on configured local process, connected account and remote APIs; review first-party privacy terms for any hosted component.
- Reviewed write actions: Framework can execute governed tool calls according to application integration
- Sensitive access: Application tools, Trace data
- Complete write authority is not verified.
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- Unknown vulnerabilities and client-side tool approvals were not exhaustively evaluated.
- full exact tool inventory or deployment-specific access configuration
- metrics, runtime/compatibility details for specific version
- Write actions/tool inventory not confirmed against exact tool documentation; listed action classes remain illustrative or context-dependent. Empty inventory does not establish read-only.
- Framework rather than standalone installable MCP Server
- MCP integration is one portion of a broader harness
- No independent release lifecycle audit; do not claim precise activity date.
Original activity observations
- GitHub REST repository pushed_at 2026-09-04T06:52:51Z for CodeSoul-co/Hypha
Technical identity
github.com/CodeSoul-co/Hypha- Exact implementation source
- https://github.com/CodeSoul-co/Hypha ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- Framework
- Repository identity
- CodeSoul-co/Hypha
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- GitHub repository ↗
codesoul-co/hypha
Recorded repository material and project history.
Setup · Watchlist
Framework setup
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructionsFramework workspace, not a standalone third-party MCP server. Clone the repository, install its locked packages and create .env; separately configure identity, secrets, model provider and MongoDB/Redis before starting npm run dev.
git clone https://github.com/CodeSoul-co/Hypha.git cd Hypha npm ci cp .env.example .envConfigure / authenticate
MCP100 setup guideEdit .env with HYPHA_OWNER_EMAIL, HYPHA_OWNER_PASSWORD and a random JWT_SECRET of at least 32 characters; select HYPHA_LLM_DEFAULT_PROVIDER, HYPHA_LLM_DEFAULT_MODEL and the matching provider key. Configure required MongoDB/Redis services before npm run dev. Do not register Hypha itself as a normal stdio MCP server.
Advanced configuration · start framework
start framework · Review before use
npm run devCheck connection
MCP100 setup guideAfter starting npm run dev in the Hypha checkout, query the publisher documented liveness and readiness routes. /api/v1/health checks process liveness; /api/v1/ready requires initialized storage, model provider, memory, runtime graph and workers. These are Hypha application checks, NOT a third-party MCP client handshake.
curl -fsS http://127.0.0.1:3000/api/v1/healthcurl -fsS http://127.0.0.1:3000/api/v1/readyRemove / uninstall / revoke
Publisher instructionsStop the Hypha app from its documented deployment working directory and remove only any corresponding project-owned MCP client entry. This project is an agent framework, not automatically a standalone MCP server.
Official Documentation & Sources
What it does
Production-oriented agent framework with packages for tool contracts, MCP gateway abstractions, policy, execution and testing.
- Capability
- Developer Tools
- Resource type
- Framework
- Best fit
- Build governed agents with MCP capability integration
Representative uses
- Integrate MCP capabilities
- Register governed tools
- Design agent runtime
- Trace and test agent actions
Limitations
- Framework rather than standalone installable MCP Server
- MCP integration is one portion of a broader harness
- Risk determined by host app policy and connected MCP tools
- No independent release lifecycle audit; do not claim precise activity date.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Application-defined providers and gateway credentials
- Permissions
- Framework can execute governed tool calls according to application integration
- Data handling
- Depends on configured local process, connected account and remote APIs; review first-party privacy terms for any hosted component.
- Cost
- unknown
- Risk and cautions
- Risk determined by host app policy and connected MCP tools
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Not verified Framework can execute governed tool calls according to application integration
- Sensitive access
- Application tools Trace data
- Risk level
- moderate
- Security notes
- Framework privileges are inherited from connected tools, agent configuration and runtime; do not label as stand-alone server. Framework executes bounded tools and MCP adapters; secret references, policy approvals and sandbox/workspace configuration are deployment-specific.
The reviewed evidence does not establish the complete write authority of this MCP. Consult the unresolved evidence before granting write access.
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-09. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.