Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow protocol-version and SDK changes that affect developers building on mcp-use
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Building and testing MCP servers, MCP Apps and agent integrations in TypeScript/Python ecosystems.
What we know
mcp-use provides framework primitives and tooling for building and testing MCP servers, MCP Apps, ChatGPT plugins and Claude connectors.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- Observed (UTC)Revert "fix(create-mcp-use-app): don& 39;t leave an empty project directo…
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Framework-level; permissions are defined by the application built on top of it. Writes: Depends on implemented tools.
- Authentication not yet verified.
- Sensitive access: Depends on implemented tools and configured providers
- The framework itself is infrastructure; effective risk is determined by the tools, secrets and endpoints developers expose.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
Popularity
10,726 repository stars · 59.1k package downloads / 30 days
Stars observed Oct 6, 2026. Downloads observed Oct 6, 2026.
All limitations / Review context
Does the framework still support the current MCP transports and client/server patterns?
The bounded assessment reviewed the official README, repository notices, security policy path, and security page for known material public-tracking blockers. No such blocker was identified. This is a public-tracking assessment, not an installation safety certification.
- The framework itself is infrastructure; effective risk is determined by the tools, secrets and endpoints developers expose.
- Framework-level; permissions are defined by the application built on top of it.
- Depends on the developer's application and connected MCP servers.
- Reviewed write actions: Depends on implemented tools
- Sensitive access: Depends on implemented tools and configured providers
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- No independent runtime, installation, or comprehensive security audit was performed.
- No installation, runtime, client matrix, or complete tool-contract audit was performed in this review.
- Application security depends on the server and tools developers build with the framework.
Original activity observations
- 2026-10-05T03:38:37Z: Revert "fix(create-mcp-use-app): don& 39;t leave an empty project directo…
Technical identity
github.com/mcp-use/mcp-use- Exact implementation source
- https://github.com/mcp-use/mcp-use ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- Framework
- Repository identity
- mcp-use/mcp-use
- Package identity
- pypi:mcp-use
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- GitHub repository ↗
mcp-use/mcp-use
Recorded repository material and project history.
- Evidence source ↗
pypi.org/project/mcp-use/
Source material retained for this review.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
Setup · Watchlist
Framework setup
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructions**MCP application framework.** Scaffold a new project with publisher `npx -y create-mcp-use-app@latest`, run generated app `npm run dev`; its MCP endpoint and Inspector are served by the app. Do not register `mcp-use` as if it were a standalone ready-made server.
package install · Publisher instructions
npx -y create-mcp-use-app@latestConfigure / authenticate
Publisher instructionsmcp-use is an SDK/framework and scaffold: npx -y create-mcp-use-app@latest; use dev client to connect a created project. It is not a third-party MCP service to install into an existing host directly.
Check connection
Suggested checkWithin the generated project, open `http://localhost:3000/mcp/inspector` (publisher example) and verify your generated tools.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
Suggested checkStop the generated `mcp-use` app (`Ctrl+C` for dev server); remove its specific MCP URL from client settings. Generated project and dependency deletion are separate developer choices.
Distinguish client registration removal from software uninstall, persistent data deletion and provider OAuth/API-key revocation.
What it does
mcp-use provides framework primitives and tooling for building and testing MCP servers, MCP Apps, ChatGPT plugins and Claude connectors.
- Capability
- Developer Tools
- Resource type
- Framework
- Industry
- Software & Technology
- Best fit
- Building and testing MCP servers, MCP Apps and agent integrations in TypeScript/Python ecosystems.
Representative uses
- Scaffold MCP projects
- Define typed tools
- Build MCP Apps and views
- Inspect and debug MCP servers
Limitations
- Application security depends on the server and tools developers build with the framework.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Not documented in the reviewed sources
- Permissions
- Framework-level; permissions are defined by the application built on top of it.
- Data handling
- Depends on the developer's application and connected MCP servers.
- Cost
- free
- Risk and cautions
- The framework itself is infrastructure; effective risk is determined by the tools, secrets and endpoints developers expose.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Depends on implemented tools
- Sensitive access
- Depends on implemented tools and configured providers
- Risk level
- unknown
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-06. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup information is documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
Is this an official MCP?
Manufact is listed as First-party MCP in MCP100’s current evidence.