MCP100 IndexFramework
WatchlistFirst-party MCP

mcp-use

by Manufact

Reviewed October 5, 2026

FrameworkSoftware & Technology

Watchlist tracking

Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.

MCP100 Assessment

Watchlist / Tracking

Why we’re tracking it

Follow protocol-version and SDK changes that affect developers building on mcp-use

Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested

Best fit

Building and testing MCP servers, MCP Apps and agent integrations in TypeScript/Python ecosystems.

What we know

mcp-use provides framework primitives and tooling for building and testing MCP servers, MCP Apps, ChatGPT plugins and Claude connectors.

Maintenance / activity evidence

  • Observed (UTC)Revert "fix(create-mcp-use-app): don& 39;t leave an empty project directo…

Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.

Verification gaps / watch-outs

  • Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
  • Framework-level; permissions are defined by the application built on top of it. Writes: Depends on implemented tools.
  • Authentication not yet verified.
  • Sensitive access: Depends on implemented tools and configured providers
  • The framework itself is infrastructure; effective risk is determined by the tools, secrets and endpoints developers expose.

Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.

Popularity

10,726 repository stars · 59.1k package downloads / 30 days

Stars observed Oct 6, 2026. Downloads observed Oct 6, 2026.

All limitations / Review context

Does the framework still support the current MCP transports and client/server patterns?

The bounded assessment reviewed the official README, repository notices, security policy path, and security page for known material public-tracking blockers. No such blocker was identified. This is a public-tracking assessment, not an installation safety certification.

  • The framework itself is infrastructure; effective risk is determined by the tools, secrets and endpoints developers expose.
  • Framework-level; permissions are defined by the application built on top of it.
  • Depends on the developer's application and connected MCP servers.
  • Reviewed write actions: Depends on implemented tools
  • Sensitive access: Depends on implemented tools and configured providers
  • Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
  • No independent runtime, installation, or comprehensive security audit was performed.
  • No installation, runtime, client matrix, or complete tool-contract audit was performed in this review.
  • Application security depends on the server and tools developers build with the framework.

Original activity observations

  • 2026-10-05T03:38:37Z: Revert "fix(create-mcp-use-app): don& 39;t leave an empty project directo…
Technical identity
github.com/mcp-use/mcp-use
Exact implementation source
https://github.com/mcp-use/mcp-use ↗
Reviewed resource type
Framework
Repository identity
mcp-use/mcp-use
Package identity
pypi:mcp-use

Evidence & Sources

Evidence basis
Recorded source evidence
Setup runtime verification
Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.

Reviewed · Latest source observation

  • GitHub repository ↗

    mcp-use/mcp-use

    Recorded repository material and project history.

  • Evidence source ↗

    pypi.org/project/mcp-use/

    Source material retained for this review.

    Includes references whose attribution is not established.