MCP100 IndexFiles & Knowledge
WatchlistFirst-party MCP

Mem0 MCP

by Mem0

Updated September 11, 2026

Files & Knowledge

MCP100 verdict

Not currently recommended. Current hosted successor is the right identity, but long-term memory add/update/delete operations require stronger hosted-service evidence before Selected.

MCP100 Assessment

Editorial verdict

Current hosted successor is the right identity, but long-term memory add/update/delete operations require stronger hosted-service evidence before Selected.

Reviewed September 11, 2026

Task Fit

Mapped

Local files and knowledge

Trust

Status warning

Editorial trust review has not been completed.

Maintenance

Date unavailable

No dated repository or package update is currently stored.

Popularity

Signals unavailable

No independently comparable adoption metric is currently stored.

Best for

  • Persistent agent memory backed by Mem0 Platform
  • Users who want a hosted MCP endpoint instead of running the archived local server

Not ideal for

  • Sensitive memory stores without clear retention/deletion/account controls
  • Workflows where the AI should never persist user data

Avoid if

  • You cannot define acceptable memory retention and deletion policy
  • You do not trust the AI client with add/update/delete memory permissions

Trade-offs

  • Cloud hosting simplifies setup but introduces a third-party data boundary
  • Memory writes can create durable effects that outlive the current session

Evidence scope

Evidence

Current source snapshot

Popularity

No MCP-specific repository metric is stored

No MCP-specific package metric is stored

Stars observation date unavailable · Downloads observation date unavailable

Maintenance

Publisher activity observed September 11, 2026

Current source snapshot

Trust review

Source relationship: First-party MCP

Reviewed September 11, 2026