Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow-up value is specific to Persistent project memory connected to coding agents over local stdio: Do scoped keyring credentials and lifecycle hooks preserve project boundaries when memories move from guest to account?
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Persistent project-scoped memory for coding agents across sessions and clients.
What we know
Adaptive agent-memory CLI that wires supported coding agents with non-destructive lifecycle hooks and a local MCP bridge for recall, remember, report, and document ingest.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- memcell 0.10.12 published 2026-09-30T15:34:18.486Z
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Project memory read/write plus local hook/MCP configuration. Writes: Create/update memories; Ingest files; Write `.memcell` and client integration config.
- Browser approval + scoped agent credential.
- Sensitive access: Project context, Agent session content, Scoped keyring credential
- Persistent project memory is useful but can contain sensitive context; service retention remains unresolved.
- Credentials are scoped and stored in the OS keyring.
- Hooks are documented as non-destructive and fail-open.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
All limitations / Review context
Do scoped keyring credentials and lifecycle hooks preserve project boundaries when memories move from guest to account?
The bounded review of the publisher's documented Persistent project memory connected to coding agents over local stdio and release notices identified no disclosed material condition preventing an accurately scoped public tracking entry. The resource's operational permissions remain uncertainty; this assessment does not certify installation safety.
- Persistent project memory is useful but can contain sensitive context; service retention remains unresolved.
- Credentials are scoped and stored in the OS keyring.
- Hooks are documented as non-destructive and fail-open.
- Project memory read/write plus local hook/MCP configuration.
- Browser approval + scoped agent credential.
- Project context, ingested documents and session reports are handled by the MemCell service; exact retention is unresolved.
- Reviewed write actions: Create/update memories; Ingest files; Write `.memcell` and client integration config
- Sensitive access: Project context, Agent session content, Scoped keyring credential
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- Runtime behavior, dependencies and undisclosed vulnerabilities were not independently audited.
- Documented tool authority and any remote data handling must be checked before installation or use.
- Tool inventory, client matrix and permissions completeness were not requirements for this Radar tracking review.
- service privacy/retention
- pricing
- exact successor package binding
- Requires Node.js 20+.
- Hooks fail open rather than blocking work.
- The original memcell-ai/cli repository was archived on 2026-10-07 and points to memcell-ai/devkit and memcell-ai/mcp.
- Service privacy/retention terms were not established in the reviewed official pages.
- Original CLI repo archived with move notice.
- Preserve repository-archive/successor caveat; do not present the archived CLI repo as the long-term implementation.
- Publisher lifecycle: active package; source repository archived
- Successor/context: memcell-ai/devkit and memcell-ai/mcp
Original activity observations
- memcell 0.10.12 published 2026-09-30T15:34:18.486Z
Technical identity
npm/memcell- Exact implementation source
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/memcell ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- MCP Server
- Repository identity
- memcell-ai/cli
- Package identity
- npm:memcell
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- Package registry ↗
memcell
Recorded package identity, distribution or download evidence.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
- Evidence source ↗
memcell.ai/docs
Source material retained for this review.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
- GitHub repository ↗
memcell-ai/cli
Repository reference; implementation attribution is not established for every document.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
Setup · Watchlist
Install & Agents
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructionsPublisher-documented package/connection route; replace placeholders and verify host-specific syntax.
Publisher setup example · Publisher instructions
npm install -g memcellConfigure / authenticate
MCP100 setup guideUse memcell connect in the intended repository to activate workspace MCP/hooks, with MemCell login/auth as required.
Use correct transport and published host config. Never paste secrets in chat; server registration is separate from software installation.
Previously reviewed configuration / prerequisites: Run memcell connect from the intended project directory; approve in browser if prompted. It auto-detects supported clients and configures agent hooks plus local MCP (`memcell mcp`). Keys go to OS keyring. Inspect client config and restart as required.
Check connection
Suggested checkmemcell status checks authentication and connection health.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guidePublisher explicitly documents `memcell hook remove` to undo repo hooks, followed by `npm uninstall -g memcell` for global CLI; local credentials are a separate optional `memcell reset` operation. Do not delete memory/project data without approval.
Local credential cache cleanup · separate from provider revocation: memcell reset clears locally cached credentials according to publisher README; do not delete user data by default.
Conditional host / package cleanup · Claude Code only · MCP100 composed guide
claude mcp remove memcell
Official Documentation & Sources
What it does
Adaptive agent-memory CLI that wires supported coding agents with non-destructive lifecycle hooks and a local MCP bridge for recall, remember, report, and document ingest.
- Capability
- Files & Knowledge
- Resource type
- MCP Server
- Best fit
- Persistent project-scoped memory for coding agents across sessions and clients.
Representative uses
- Recall verified project context before implementation
- Record directives, facts, conventions and outcomes
- Ingest architecture/spec/post-mortem files
- Report session outcomes and attributed savings
Limitations
- Requires Node.js 20+.
- Hooks fail open rather than blocking work.
- The original memcell-ai/cli repository was archived on 2026-10-07 and points to memcell-ai/devkit and memcell-ai/mcp.
- Service privacy/retention terms were not established in the reviewed official pages.
- Original CLI repo archived with move notice.
- Preserve repository-archive/successor caveat; do not present the archived CLI repo as the long-term implementation.
- Publisher lifecycle: active package; source repository archived
- Successor/context: memcell-ai/devkit and memcell-ai/mcp
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Browser approval + scoped agent credential.
- Permissions
- Project memory read/write plus local hook/MCP configuration.
- Data handling
- Project context, ingested documents and session reports are handled by the MemCell service; exact retention is unresolved.
- Cost
- unknown
- Risk and cautions
- Persistent project memory is useful but can contain sensitive context; service retention remains unresolved.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Create/update memories Ingest files Write `.memcell` and client integration config
- Sensitive access
- Project context Agent session content Scoped keyring credential
- Risk level
- moderate
- Security notes
- Credentials are scoped and stored in the OS keyring. Hooks are documented as non-destructive and fail-open.
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-08. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup and authentication are documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
Is this an official MCP?
OpenOri / open-cipher is listed as First-party MCP in MCP100’s current evidence.