Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow credential-handling and hosted-connector changes because the service brokers external access
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Operating durable authenticated app connections behind MCP and HTTP interfaces.
What we know
OpenConnector is a connector runtime for durable app connections. It manages API/OAuth credentials and exposes provider actions through MCP and HTTP/OpenAPI interfaces.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- Observed (UTC)fix(fxmacrodata): align pagination and redact escaped keys ( 654)
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Can call actions exposed by configured providers. Writes: Depends on provider actions enabled.
- Stores/uses provider OAuth or API credentials.
- Sensitive access: OAuth tokens, API keys, Connected application data
- The gateway centralizes third-party credentials and can invoke state-changing provider actions; scopes should be minimized per connector.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
Popularity
5,950 repository stars
Stars observed Oct 6, 2026.
All limitations / Review context
Have credential storage, OAuth scope, and connector behavior changed since this review?
The official policy and README describe credential and OAuth handling by the connector; the bounded assessment found no separate public-tracking blocker, but records the data-handling scope as an uncertainty rather than claiming installation safety.
- The gateway centralizes third-party credentials and can invoke state-changing provider actions; scopes should be minimized per connector.
- Can call actions exposed by configured providers.
- Stores/uses provider OAuth or API credentials.
- Provider data and action payloads pass through the connector runtime.
- Reviewed write actions: Depends on provider actions enabled
- Sensitive access: OAuth tokens, API keys, Connected application data
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- The connector brokers API keys/OAuth credentials and logs operational data according to its documented design; no independent data-handling audit was performed.
- No independent runtime, installation, or comprehensive security audit was performed.
- No installation, runtime, client matrix, or complete tool-contract audit was performed in this review.
- Self-hosted OAuth providers require client credentials.
- Effective permissions depend on each connected service and selected actions.
Original activity observations
- 2026-10-05T14:56:33Z: fix(fxmacrodata): align pagination and redact escaped keys ( 654)
Technical identity
github.com/oomol-lab/open-connector- Exact implementation source
- https://github.com/oomol-lab/open-connector ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- Gateway
- Repository identity
- oomol-lab/open-connector
- Service endpoint
- http://localhost:3000/mcp
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- GitHub repository ↗
oomol-lab/open-connector
Recorded repository material and project history.
Setup · Watchlist
Self-hosted gateway service setup
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructionsOpenConnector is a self-hosted connector gateway with optional vendor-hosted OAuth service.
self hosted install or run · Publisher instructions
git clone https://github.com/oomol-lab/open-connector.git cd open-connector docker compose upConfigure / authenticate
Publisher instructionsOpenConnector self-hosted OAuth/API-key gateway: Docker Compose starts runtime; OOMOL managed hosted option is separate. Protect secrets and test no-auth action first.
Check connection
Suggested checkPublisher documents a no-auth Action as a safe runtime smoke check.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guideFrom only OpenConnector deployment folder; unregister the gateway from MCP host, retain DB state/volumes unless explicitly purging.
Distinguish client registration removal from software uninstall, persistent data deletion and provider OAuth/API-key revocation.
docker compose down
What it does
OpenConnector is a connector runtime for durable app connections. It manages API/OAuth credentials and exposes provider actions through MCP and HTTP/OpenAPI interfaces.
- Capability
- Productivity & Collaboration
- Resource type
- Gateway
- Best fit
- Operating durable authenticated app connections behind MCP and HTTP interfaces.
Representative uses
- Connect OAuth/API-key services
- Run provider actions
- Inspect action schemas and policies
- Operate connectors from a web console
Limitations
- Self-hosted OAuth providers require client credentials.
- Effective permissions depend on each connected service and selected actions.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Stores/uses provider OAuth or API credentials.
- Permissions
- Can call actions exposed by configured providers.
- Data handling
- Provider data and action payloads pass through the connector runtime.
- Cost
- usage_based
- Risk and cautions
- The gateway centralizes third-party credentials and can invoke state-changing provider actions; scopes should be minimized per connector.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Depends on provider actions enabled
- Sensitive access
- OAuth tokens API keys Connected application data
- Risk level
- high
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-06. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.
Which tasks are documented for this implementation?
What setup and authentication are documented?
Can it modify data or perform write operations?
What data-handling boundary should I consider?
What limitations and risks should I check before use?
What cost model is recorded?
Is this an official MCP?
OOMOL is listed as First-party MCP in MCP100’s current evidence.