Watchlist tracking
Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.
MCP100 Assessment
Watchlist / Tracking
Why we’re tracking it
Follow-up value is specific to Reviewable private HTML artifacts and workspace handoffs: Does web authorization and keyring fallback retain workspace privacy when reviewer links are shared?
Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested
Best fit
Discover a local Reviewable workspace and create private HTML review artifacts for human review.
What we know
Registry monitoring identifies this as a local-only stdio MCP for workspace discovery and private HTML review creation, intended to put human-reviewable artifacts around agent work.
Maintenance / activity evidence
- reviewable-artifacts-mcp 0.4.1 published 2026-09-08T15:51:28.371Z
Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: low.
Verification gaps / watch-outs
- Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
- Permissions not yet verified. Complete write authority is not verified.
- Authentication not yet verified.
- Sensitive access: Local project/review content
- Human-review tooling is useful, but local file/privacy boundary needs first-party confirmation.
Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.
All limitations / Review context
Does web authorization and keyring fallback retain workspace privacy when reviewer links are shared?
The bounded review of the publisher's documented Reviewable private HTML artifacts and workspace handoffs and release notices identified no disclosed material condition preventing an accurately scoped public tracking entry. The resource's operational permissions remain uncertainty; this assessment does not certify installation safety.
- Human-review tooling is useful, but local file/privacy boundary needs first-party confirmation.
- Potential local HTML/workspace data; whether content leaves local machine is unresolved.
- Sensitive access: Local project/review content
- Complete write authority is not verified.
- Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
- Runtime behavior, dependencies and undisclosed vulnerabilities were not independently audited.
- Documented tool authority and any remote data handling must be checked before installation or use.
- Tool inventory, client matrix and permissions completeness were not requirements for this Radar tracking review.
- official package/repository details
- filesystem scope
- auth
- upload/retention behavior
- complete tool schemas
- First-party documentation/package page was not available in this research pass.
- Exact local file access, authentication, retention, upload behavior and review-sharing model remain unresolved.
Original activity observations
- reviewable-artifacts-mcp 0.4.1 published 2026-09-08T15:51:28.371Z
Technical identity
npm/reviewable-artifacts-mcp- Exact implementation source
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/reviewable-artifacts-mcp ↗
- Reviewed resource type
- MCP Server
- Package identity
- npm:reviewable-artifacts-mcp
Evidence & Sources
- Evidence basis
- Recorded source evidence
- Setup runtime verification
- Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.
Reviewed · Latest source observation
- Package registry metadata ↗
reviewable-artifacts-mcp
Recorded package identity, distribution or download evidence.
- Evidence source ↗
bereviewable.com/agents
Source material retained for this review.
Includes references whose attribution is not established.
Setup · Watchlist
Install & Agents
Publisher instructions.
Source evidence observed .
Additional setup details required — see the specific gaps below.
Install / connect
Publisher instructionsPublisher-documented package/connection route; replace placeholders and verify host-specific syntax.
Publisher setup example · Claude Code only · Publisher instructions
claude mcp add --transport stdio reviewable-artifacts -- npx -y reviewable-artifacts-mcpConfigure / authenticate
MCP100 setup guideCall start_web_authorization, approve consent/scope in browser, then check_authorization; no static API credential required for initial registration.
Use correct transport and published host config. Never paste secrets in chat; server registration is separate from software installation.
Check connection
Suggested checkUse publisher check_authorization; do not create or publish reviewable artifacts solely to test.
Remove / uninstall / revoke
MCP100 setup guideIf registered as `reviewable-artifacts-mcp` in Claude Code, remove its exact client entry with `claude mcp remove reviewable-artifacts-mcp`; for Cursor/Claude Desktop/Codex, remove the matching MCP entry in that host settings. This client removal is MCP100-composed, not a vendor uninstall instruction. Npx does not imply a global install; do not delete user data or revoke credentials implicitly.
Publisher install example registration name(s): reviewable-artifacts. The supplied removal example applies only to an existing Claude Code registration named reviewable-artifacts-mcp; it does not remove the differently named install example. Confirm the actual host entry before use.
Conditional host / package cleanup · Claude Code only · MCP100 composed guide · Review before use
claude mcp remove reviewable-artifacts-mcp
Official Documentation & Sources
What it does
Registry monitoring identifies this as a local-only stdio MCP for workspace discovery and private HTML review creation, intended to put human-reviewable artifacts around agent work.
- Capability
- Productivity & Collaboration
- Resource type
- MCP Server
- Best fit
- Discover a local Reviewable workspace and create private HTML review artifacts for human review.
Representative uses
- Discover local reviewable workspace
- Create private HTML review artifact
- Hand an agent-created artifact to a human reviewer
Limitations
- First-party documentation/package page was not available in this research pass.
- Exact local file access, authentication, retention, upload behavior and review-sharing model remain unresolved.
Reviewed access
Access & risk
Review the exact access boundary before connecting this MCP to accounts, credentials, or sensitive data.
- Authentication
- Not documented in the reviewed sources
- Permissions
- Not documented in the reviewed sources
- Data handling
- Potential local HTML/workspace data; whether content leaves local machine is unresolved.
- Cost
- unknown
- Risk and cautions
- Human-review tooling is useful, but local file/privacy boundary needs first-party confirmation.
Access scope and cautions
- Write actions
- Not verified
- Sensitive access
- Local project/review content
- Risk level
- moderate
The reviewed evidence does not establish the complete write authority of this MCP. Consult the unresolved evidence before granting write access.
FAQ
Based on reviewed evidence as of 2026-10-08. Watchlist tracking is not a recommendation or a security certification.