MCP100 IndexMCP Server
WatchlistCommunity implementation

roam-code

by Cranot

Reviewed October 5, 2026

MCP Server

Watchlist tracking

Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.

MCP100 Assessment

Watchlist / Tracking

Why we’re tracking it

Follow index and check coverage as the analysis engine evolves

Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested

Best fit

Codebase graph/context intelligence for review, refactor, debug and change-safety workflows.

What we know

Local code-intelligence CLI/MCP with graph indexing, impact analysis and selectable task-specific tool presets.

Maintenance / activity evidence

  • Observed (UTC)fix(W805-EEEEE): update sister cross-check for W805-CCCCC fix lockstep

Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.

Activity source · commits ↗Activity source · releases ↗

Verification gaps / watch-outs

  • Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
  • Primarily local code-index/read analysis. Writes: Write/update local index metadata.
  • Authentication not yet verified.
  • Sensitive access: Source code
  • Primarily read/analysis oriented; main risk is exposing source context to the connected model.
Security source · repository notice ↗Security source · policy file ↗

Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.

Popularity

518 repository stars

Stars observed Sep 25, 2026.

Do not overwrite existing reviewed stars/download metrics with nulls from this enrichment batch.

Do not overwrite existing reviewed stars/download metrics with nulls from this enrichment batch.

All limitations / Review context

Which code-index, finding, and MCP-facing check operations remain reproducible?

The bounded assessment reviewed the official README, repository notices, security policy path, and security page for known material public-tracking blockers. No such blocker was identified. This is a public-tracking assessment, not an installation safety certification.

  • Primarily read/analysis oriented; main risk is exposing source context to the connected model.
  • Primarily local code-index/read analysis.
  • Indexes source locally; no external service requirement established.
  • Reviewed write actions: Write/update local index metadata
  • Sensitive access: Source code
  • Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
  • No independent runtime, installation, or comprehensive security audit was performed.
  • No installation, runtime, client matrix, or complete tool-contract audit was performed in this review.
  • Results can be partial/stale and must be checked for errors/scope/freshness.
  • The meta-tool reports available presets but does not hot-switch the running server.

Original activity observations

  • 2026-10-03T09:02:36Z: fix(W805-EEEEE): update sister cross-check for W805-CCCCC fix lockstep
Technical identity
github.com/cranot/roam-code
Exact implementation source
https://github.com/cranot/roam-code ↗
Reviewed resource type
MCP Server
Repository identity
cranot/roam-code
Package identity
pypi:roam-code

Evidence & Sources

Evidence basis
Recorded source evidence
Setup runtime verification
Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.

Reviewed · Latest source observation

  • GitHub repository ↗

    cranot/roam-code

    Recorded repository material and project history.

    Includes references whose attribution is not established.