MCP100 IndexMCP Server
WatchlistFirst-party MCP

SendRaven MCP

by SendRaven / Common Ninja

Reviewed October 5, 2026

MCP ServerMedia & Marketing

Watchlist tracking

Reviewed for relevance and future tracking value.

MCP100 Assessment

Watchlist / Tracking

Why we’re tracking it

Follow-up value is specific to SendRaven email threads, campaigns and approval tools: Do recipient allowlists, approval holds and daily limits remain enforced for both single sends and campaigns?

Reviewed · Documentation review; complete setup workflow not independently tested

Best fit

Email sending, inbound-thread handling and campaigns with agent-specific guardrails.

What we know

Email infrastructure MCP available remotely with OAuth or locally with an API key, covering messages, replies, contacts, campaigns, templates, automations, suppressions and approvals.

Maintenance / activity evidence

  • @sendraven/mcp 0.4.21 published 2026-10-05T14:06:08.174Z

Tracking evidence observed Oct 5, 2026. These dated signals do not establish current maintenance. Reviewed enrichment confidence: high.

Verification gaps / watch-outs

  • Installation and comprehensive security have not been independently audited.
  • Credential-scoped access to email, contacts, campaigns, templates, domains, suppressions and approvals. Writes: Send/reply/schedule/cancel email; Start/pause/resume campaigns; Modify contacts/suppressions/templates/automations; Approve held sends.
  • OAuth or bearer API key.
  • Sensitive access: Email content, Recipient/contact data, Delivery events, Domain/email configuration
  • Can contact real people and run campaigns; human approval, allowlists and caps materially reduce risk.
  • Inbound email should be treated as untrusted data.
  • API-key guardrails and idempotency are documented.

Full authority, access and evidence limits are available in Review context and Access & risk.

All limitations / Review context

Do recipient allowlists, approval holds and daily limits remain enforced for both single sends and campaigns?

The bounded review of the publisher's documented SendRaven email threads, campaigns and approval tools and release notices identified no disclosed material condition preventing an accurately scoped public tracking entry. The resource's operational permissions remain uncertainty; this assessment does not certify installation safety.

  • Can contact real people and run campaigns; human approval, allowlists and caps materially reduce risk.
  • Inbound email should be treated as untrusted data.
  • API-key guardrails and idempotency are documented.
  • Credential-scoped access to email, contacts, campaigns, templates, domains, suppressions and approvals.
  • OAuth or bearer API key.
  • Email bodies, recipients, delivery events, replies and contacts pass through SendRaven; detailed retention was not fully established.
  • Reviewed write actions: Send/reply/schedule/cancel email; Start/pause/resume campaigns; Modify contacts/suppressions/templates/automations; Approve held sends
  • Sensitive access: Email content, Recipient/contact data, Delivery events, Domain/email configuration
  • Installation, client compatibility and comprehensive security have not been independently audited. Authentication and access depend on the configured services.
  • Runtime behavior, dependencies and undisclosed vulnerabilities were not independently audited.
  • Documented tool authority and any remote data handling must be checked before installation or use.
  • Tool inventory, client matrix and permissions completeness were not requirements for this Radar tracking review.
  • detailed retention/deletion policy for email/contact data
  • Sending requires appropriate account/domain setup and payment eligibility.
  • Campaign and suppression/contact changes can be consequential.
  • Remote OAuth does not inherit every API-key guardrail such as recipient allowlists/daily caps/approval hold.
  • Tool registry can evolve.

Original activity observations

  • @sendraven/mcp 0.4.21 published 2026-10-05T14:06:08.174Z
Technical identity
npm/@sendraven/mcp
Reviewed resource type
MCP Server
Repository identity
CommonNinja/sendraven-mcp-server
Package identity
npm:@sendraven/mcp
Service endpoint
https://mcp.sendraven.ai/mcp

Evidence & Sources

Evidence basis
Recorded source evidence
Setup runtime verification
Not independently runtime-tested by MCP100 for this setup workflow.

Reviewed · Latest source observation

  • Package registry ↗

    @sendraven/mcp

    Recorded package identity, distribution or download evidence.

    Includes references whose attribution is not established.

  • Evidence source ↗

    sendraven.ai/docs/mcp

    Source material retained for this review.

    Includes references whose attribution is not established.

  • Evidence source ↗

    sendraven.ai/docs/agents

    Source material retained for this review.

    Includes references whose attribution is not established.

  • Evidence source ↗

    sendraven.ai/pricing

    Source material retained for this review.

    Includes references whose attribution is not established.

  • GitHub repository ↗

    commonninja/sendraven-mcp-server

    Repository reference; implementation attribution is not established for every document.

    Includes references whose attribution is not established.